yes
A self-governed by Puritan leaders.
i don`t no but i think it is self government by puritan leaders
In the Massachusetts Bay Colony, from 1630 to 1684, the colony was self-governed by laws drawn up by the Massachusetts General Court, which was established under the Massachusetts Bay Company charter. All of the representatives in the Massachusetts General Court were, necessarily, delegates from the Puritan congregations in their communities. Parliament revoked the charter in 1684 and sent over a royal governor in 1686.
Roger Williams, Anne Hutchinson, and Thomas Hooker all disagreed with the Puritan leaders in the Massachusetts colony. However, Thomas Hooker participated in the attempts of the Puritan leaders to deal with Roger Williams and Anne Hutchinson.Thomas Hooker led a group of followers to form a more liberal Puritan colony in Hartford, Connecticut, while Anne Hutchinson and Roger Williams were banished from Massachusetts and went to Rhode Island.
American colonists wanted to be self-governed.A self-governed camp for drug addicts would surely fail. Though the teenager claimed he was old enough to be self-governed, he continually got into legal trouble.
Yes, it was self governed.
Self-government is a government which is governed by itself. It is self controlling.
Self-government is a government which is governed by itself. It is self controlling.
Self-Government
Self-governed.
Self-Government
A proprietary colony is a colony governed by a supporter of england. He gets a land grant for being a good boy. A self governed colony was governed by the people. The king has nothing to do with it.