In fact, an important, well disguised theme of Acts is the primacy of St Peter over St Paul, drawing them together in a number of subtle comparisons, even when those comparisons are in widely separated chapters. If a previously unknown miracle was attributed to Paul, then quite comparable miracles were also associated with Peter, and the miracles associated with Paul were always less impressive those associated with Peter.
It may be that by the time Acts was written, Paul was venerated above all other apostles, but the author of Acts seems to have sought to reduce his prominence in the Church by elevating Peter over him.
A:
Paul as portrayed in the Acts of the Apostles is certainly supposed to be the historical Paul who helped spread Christianity through Asia Minor and Greece, and who wrote a number of epistles that now form part of the New Testament. The portrayal of Paul may be very much at odds with the Paul of the epistles, but there is no doubt the Paul portrayed here is intended to be the same person.
The Book of Acts says that Paul's birth name was Saul, a fact of which Paul himself, in his epistles, seems to have been unaware. It has been pointed out that the author of Acts likes to attribute Aramaic names to Christians with Greek names.
Arguably the whole of the Acts of the Apostles is about the apostle Paul, but the second part is certainly about Paul.
It stands for the acts of the apostles. Acts is the book that describes the narrative of the early Apostles lives, focusing especially on the two most prominent of those Apostles which were Peter and Paul.
AnswerThere is no clarity on this. Paul called himself an apostle, but Acts of the Apostles seems reluctant to use this term about Paul. Acts suggests that the twelve disciples became apostles at the Pentacost. The word comes from Greek, to mean a messenger.
There were 13 apostles in the New Testament. There were 14 apostles in the New Testament. Paul was called an apostle, as were the 12 disciples who followed Jesus. Acts of the Apostles says that Matthias was appointed as a further apostle to replace Judas Iscariot.
The Gospel of Matthew is traditionally attributed to the apostle Matthew, while the Acts of the Apostles is traditionally attributed to Luke, a companion of the apostle Paul.
Paul himself, in his epistles, never mentioned his birthplace. The Acts of the Apostles, written some decades later, has Paul say that he was from Tarsus.
In the Acts of the Apostles, Luke does not tell us the story of all the apostles. A few are mentioned here and there. Luke concentrates mainly on the Apostle Peter and the Apostle Paul. The latter part of the book is the Apostle Paul's part in spreading Christianity, and so Luke ends the book by telling us that Paul is still under the Roman hand, but is not in prison, perse, but has rented his own house, receiving all who come to him preaching the kingdom of God and teaching the things of Christ.
No, the book of Romans was written by the Apostle Paul. Luke wrote the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the Apostles in the New Testament.
The Apostle Paul was one of Jesus' followers, one of the 12 apostles. He spread the word of Jesus to people.
None of the apostles were Greeks. Paul specifically mentions that Titus was a Greek (Galatians 2:3), and Luke (the author of Acts and the gospel that bears his name) wasn't a Jew, but neither of them were apostles.
Paul The Apostle was arrested in Caesarea.
The Paul referred to in the book of Acts was 'Saul', who became the 'Apostle Paul' (Acts 13:9) after his experience with the resurrected Jesus. He, Timothy, Barnabas, Silas and the rest of the new Christian congregation, worked together as active proclaimers of the 'good news' for many years(Acts 15:35)(Acts 17:2-4)(Acts 18:5)