It depends on what a good ruler is.
Is it one who kills her people.
or is it one who thinks she owns everything.
If she didn't Kill her people then she must have been
a good ruler
she wasnt
King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella.
Balban was considered a firm ruler, he ruled with an iron fist, and by today's standards he would be considered a dictator, with a slave culture, he definately couldn'tÊbe calledÊweak, but not sure ifÊhe would beÊconsidered good.
Queen Isabella of Castile was a major supporter of Humanistic education in Spain and Portugal during her lifetime. In fact the Royal Court of Spain held at least two classical schools, again which Isabella supported and helped come to fruition. Most noble women of the time period WERE tutored, they could read and do figures, they learned languages and diplomacy; as well as more domestic subjects- all in the expectation of them someday playing their royal parts.
CoronatedCoronaTiara
Solomon was considered as a wise ruler and a good king as god was with him.
Yes, he was a good ruler
Noel sounds to me like it would go well with Isabella. Isabella Jo
Most royal men, mainly Protestants because she was a Protestant. She was queen of England, Ireland and Wales, in her own right so very powerful. She was clearly viewed as a good ruler as the people of the Netherlands invited her to be their queen to.
Isabella
How was Hadrian a good or bad ruler
Some good middle name options for Isabella could be Grace, Rose, Ann, or Marie.