Was Richard II a good king?

Answer 1

He was really bad. He killed 2,700 prisoners just because Salidan was a little wait to come get them.

King Richard III had many bad points but however disturbing they were, they were all in good favour. The bad things he done were obviously not ment to be comitted, but however it just proved how much determination he had to become King. King Richard the third was very heartless man and didn't have any consideration for others that witnessed things, or even those of whom he married.

Just asking, but can someone identify the bad points of Richard III, and also, who is Salidan. (i found that he/she was a Muslim leader associated with Richard I, not Richard III)

Answer 2

That depends on your point of view.... he didn't speak English & spent less than a year in England during his reign. 1189-1199.( Just to say that in the film 'Robin Hood, Prince of Thieves' he was played by Sean Connery, a Scotsman who doesn't support the Monarchy and lives in Spain !) He was however, apparrently, strong & brave & led forces to Palestine on the 3rd Crusade against Saladin.

Answer 3

King Richard I The Lionheart Was Absolutely a Tremendously bad king . He Wanted War and Hell to Islam and Usually to Christanity for what he was doing . His Home was Acre,England.. It's a Crusader HQ When it comes to that and its very dangerous . If you touched a Guard , They would stab you.. Super Harsh.. King Richard Ordered his men to Kill Muslims , Christians, Catholics ... Anything which was a Threat to him and His "Order" But Really It's Up to your choice if you think he is a good king or not? Remember ... It's All in the Gigantic History of Militarie Powers from 910 B.C. and Much later on.

Answer 4

no

bad