Mark was a follower/ disciple of Jesus. He was of no blood kin.
Yes
Mark, who wrote the Gospel of Mark, was a disciple of Peter, who was a disciple of Jesus.
The disciple listened closely as their mentor shared valuable teachings and guidance.
No he was a disciple (follower) of him
Mark was never a disciple of jesus christ .He wrote the gospel of Mark. he did not write the book of act.
It is not known whether St. Luke the Evangelist (who incidentally was a disciple of St. Paul, not directly a disciple of Jesus) was married or had children. He certainly did, however, have a mother and a father.
Saint Andrew was a disciple of John the Baptist who followed Jesus after hearing his teachings. Andrew met Jesus along with his brother Peter while they were fishing, and Jesus called them to become his disciples. Through this encounter, Andrew came to know Jesus and became one of his closest followers.
If you are referring to St. Joseph the foster father of Jesus, he was not a disciple as he died long before Our Lord began his public life. If you refer to Saint Joseph of Arimathea, he was a disciple but a secret one initially.
He was a disciple of Jesus aka John Mark a cousin of Barnabas and on many occasions worked along with the Apostle Paul . and as such was in the ministry constantly this helped him live by Christian standards
Because he was originally a fisherman, when Jesus called him to be a disciple.
John was a disciple of Jesus. As time went on Jesus, changed John's name to Mark. Just as he did with Simon of Jonas; He change his name to Peter.
Simon was no blood relation to Jesus. Jesus simply chose him to be His disciple, and later gave him his new surname, Peter, (Mark 3.16).
Judas Iscariot was the disciple who betrayed Jesus.