YES. To find out why, please see the Related Question: Why was the Battle of Stalingrad considered a turning point of World War II?
Stalingrad wasn't the turning point for the war in North Africa. Stalingrad is in Russia, not North Africa. Stalingrad was a turning point for the war on the Eastern Front because it ground the German Army's advance to a halt and mired them in a nasty stalemate.
Yes , on the Eastern Front the Germans lost the struggle against the Russians for the city of Stalingrad ; the Russians went on to Berlin winning the war against the Germans .
Stalingrad was the turning point of WWII according to many historians. Stalingrad had the greatest causualties of any battle in WWII do to two dictators egos. Hitler refused to withdraw the 6th army even when they realized they were going to be sorounded by the Russians and trapped in Stalingrad.
Stalingrad is generally regarded as the key turning point in the war in Europe. After that Hitler had no hope of winning the war; he was only able to prolong it. Stalingrad was a major defeat with the surrender of the 6th Army. This was where the Russians stopped the German advance towards the oil-fields, without which the Germans could not continue fighting the war for very long.
Stalingrad is regarded as the turning point for the eastern front.
The Battle of Stalingrad .
the Battle Of Stalingrad
Yes , the Battle of Stalingrad was a turning point on the Eastern Front , one from which the Germans never regained the initiative .
It was a major turning point in World War II because it was Hitler's mistake. Germany lost the battle of Stalingrad so it crippled Germany
The Russians held out at Stalingrad for many months. The Battle of Stalingrad was a long, epic, very bloody battle. It was the first time that German forces had been defeated and started a Soviet offensive.
It wasn't a turning point, it was the liberation of Western Europe. The turning point in Europe in WWII was the Battle Of Stalingrad.
Battle of Stalingrad