Yes. The Japanese were more than willing to fight until the last man, taking as many enemy as they could with them.
Had to learn to fight a war with one's hands tied; had to fight without using all of one's weapons (no nukes).
President Truman faced the significant advantage of potentially shortening World War II and preventing further American casualties by using atomic bombs on Japan, which led to Japan's swift surrender. However, a major disadvantage was the ethical implications and the long-term consequences of nuclear warfare, including immense civilian casualties and the start of a nuclear arms race, fundamentally altering international relations and warfare.
End WW2, ASAP.
do it yor self
The concern was that the USSR might retaliate by using atomic bombs on our troops in Korea.
President Truman considered issues like death toll, atomic fallout, and political consequences before using the atomic bomb. In the end, it was determined that it would save many lives by avoiding a conventional battle.
Saving the lives of the soldiers (mostly marines) needed to invade Japan.
he could have invaded but that would cause far more caualties
To save the lives of American GI's who were slated to invade Japan.
Yes....and any real person would have done the same thing
Probably as soon as Stimson informed him that it was being worked on.
President Truman justified using the atomic bomb in World War II by claiming it would lead to a quicker end to the war and save countless lives, both American and Japanese, by avoiding a costly invasion of Japan. Many scientists, including some involved in the Manhattan Project, opposed its use due to ethical concerns and the potential for unprecedented destruction and civilian casualties. Truman did not bomb Tokyo because it had already suffered extensive damage from previous bombings, and targeting cities like Hiroshima and Nagasaki was intended to demonstrate the bomb's devastating power while minimizing further destruction in major urban centers.