No, as the soldier was a child once (and would not then have been a soldier) his lifetime, by definition, can not all have been "hard at war".
it was hard it was hard it was hard
that's a hard question
It's hard for soldiers to fight if they have no food.
Ethiopia because they win the a hard war
The Vietnam war effected soldiers physically with strain of fighting in the jungle but it also effected soldiers psychological mind set. Soldiers were pulled out of school and work at the age of 17 and thrown into the war. The soldiers had to drink and smoke marijuana to deal with the war. It was hard for soldiers to come back for war and make a life.
it was a very hard bread that the soldiers of civil war ate when they had no other food!
The Continental soldiers possessed die hard grit that helped them in winning the Revolutionary War. They were also very smart in the tactical part of the war.
no? yes they were children were strapped with grenades and would walk up to soldiers and kill themselves and the soldiers.
This is most likely called hardtack. it was given to soldiers to soldiers in the civil war and was fried in lard or buffalo fat. meh
Soldiers at War happened in 1998.
No there was not a war going on during Tycho Brahe's lifetime.
they were unknown soldiers from world war 1, world war 2, Vietnam war, and the Korean war