No
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)Justice John Marshall Harlan, a former slave owner!
plessy vs. ferguson
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)John Marshall Harlan dissented from the Court's opinion in the case and correctly predicted the long-term impact of the Court's decision.
what was Plessy vs ferguson
He wanted to become a lawyer and overturn the Plessy vs. Ferguson policy.
Plessy v. Ferguson
The main people involved in Plessy v. Ferguson were Homer Plessy, who was the plaintiff in the case and a man of mixed racial heritage, and Judge John H. Ferguson, who was the defendant in his capacity as a judge responsible for enforcing segregation laws in Louisiana. The lawyers who represented the parties before the Supreme Court were Albion Tourgée for Plessy and Milton J. Cunningham for Ferguson.
From the plaintiff, Homer Plessy, and the defendant, John Howard Ferguson.
This is from the Supreme Court case Plessy vs. Ferguson.
He was the person in the case of plessy v.s Ferguson .And Ferguson won
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)No. Plessy v. Ferguson was a US Supreme Court case that legally sanctioned racial segregation.
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 US 537 (1896)Plessy v. Ferguson was a US Supreme Court case, not a person. Homer Plessy, the petitioner and John Ferguson, the nominal respondent, were both male, but that fact is completely irrelevant to the case.