0
Ham, son of Noah, was cursed for doing something he should not have done (seeing his father Noah drunk and naked).
Answer B: The Bible does not say that Ham was cursed. It says his son Canaan was cursed.
What else can I help you with?
Why was canaan cursed?
Canaan was cursed because he was born of incest. His father was Ham and his mother was Noah's wife, who was also Ham's mother.Answer:Canaan was cursed for the reason stated explicitly in Genesis ch.9. Noah refrained from cursing the perpetrator, Ham, because God Himself had blessed Noah and his three sons.
Who are the african americans according to the bible?
They come from Ham, Noah's son. Genesis 10:6 "And the sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, and Phut, and Canaan." the bible says that some come from ham's branch and some say that ham's branch was cursed but this is not true. he had a son named Canaan this is who was cursed, not the tribe (the Canaanites)
What is the curse of Ham?
Ham, son of Noah, was cursed for doing something he should not have done (seeing his father Noah drunk and naked). Answer B: The Bible does not say that Ham was cursed. It says his son Canaan was cursed.
How was Noahs son Ham cursed?
The reason why ham was cursed was because of the fact that Noah was celebrating the fact that he and his family have been set free from the aspect of what it happened with the flood and with that his son Ham noticed his father being naked and made fun of the issue and was cursed because of that; whereas his two brothers were respectful to their father Noah and they went in with a covering backwards and put the covering over their naked father. Answer 2 Ham was not cursed by anyone. Noah cursed Canaan one of Ham's sons (Genesis 9).
What were some pro-slavery arguments used in the 1800s?
The biggest was that, because of the postdeluvian interaction of Sam, Ham, and Noah, Ham and his people were cursed to be servants of Sam's people.
Why do Mormans dislike Black race?
Mormons are getting better about this, but historically the Mormon church has maintained that black people are the descendants of Ham, a biblical figure, and that they have been cursed with black skin for the sins of Ham, their ancestor. So they alleged that all black people were cursed, basically.
Who was Noah's son that was accursed for looking upon his father naked?
Ham was the son of Noah that saw his father naked. After Noah woke, he laid a curse upon Ham, saying, cursed be Canaan.
Which one of Noah's sons disgraced him received a curse from Noah?
Ham disgraced Noah and was cursed for it. The account is in Genesis 9:20-27.
Did Noah curse his son Ham or grandson Canaan in Genesis 9 verses 21 thru 25?
In Genesis, Noah cursed Canaan only, and did not curse Ham nor any others of Ham's children. The story of Noah and his Ark is now recognised by scholars as unhistorical. Since the Canaanites were the traditional enemy of the Hebrew people, the legend developed around a curse on their putative ancestor.
Why was Canaan during the time of Noah cursed?
the name Canaan is synonymous to Tagalog word " Kanaan" (commiting sins without boundary) .The story was about the wrong intention of Cham(son of noah) he looked the naked body of his father noah and commited sin (maybe homosexual orientation) .Noah knew what his son cham did so he cursed canaan (the offspring of Cham) because he knew what kind of people are the sons of Canaan.
How was the myth of Noah's curse used to subjugate the people of African descent?
The curse of Ham is a biblical fallacy perpetrated by people who wanted to justify the enslavement of black people. The premise was that Noah cursed Ham, his black son, and doomed him to a life of servitude to others (slavery). In actuality, there is no curse of Ham, who was Ethiopian, but a curse of Canaan, who was not.
How did the curse of ham contribute to the belief that slavery was okay?
The Curse of Ham was an interpretation of a biblical story that suggested Ham, one of Noah's sons, was cursed with black skin as punishment. This interpretation was used to justify the enslavement of people of African descent, suggesting they were inherently inferior and destined for servitude. It perpetuated the belief that slavery was morally acceptable for certain races based on religious doctrine.
