no
Funding for Social programs. Most "liberals" would be in favor of less defense spending and higher corporate taxes.
Public funding is funding that is provided by the government. Many social programs designed to help people receive public funding.
No-this would be unconstitutional. There is some federal funding for school programs and for social services programs, however.
They increased defense spending and lowered taxes.
Some economists and critics have blamed the widening gap between the rich and the poor on Reaganomics. His tax cuts and other policies gave additional money to the rich. He cut social programs, increasing the depth of poverty and promoted "Trickle Down Economics".
Reaganomics. Illegal drugs.
The three goals of Reaganomics were to lower taxes, higher defense spending, and curtailed spending for social surfaces. Reagan's plan to help the economy.
One particular concern of countries with aging populations is the strain on their healthcare and social security systems. As the elderly population grows, there is an increased demand for healthcare services and pensions, which can put a financial burden on the working-age population. Additionally, there may be a shrinking workforce to support the economy and contribute to pension and healthcare funding.
Budget cutz in social programz
President Reagan's budget cuts, part of his broader economic policy known as "Reaganomics," disproportionately affected economically depressed members of society by reducing funding for essential social programs. Cuts to welfare, housing assistance, and education resources left vulnerable populations with less support, exacerbating poverty and inequality. Additionally, the reduction in federal aid to states strained local programs designed to assist low-income individuals and families, leading to increased hardship. Overall, these policies intensified the struggles of those already facing economic challenges.
a decrease in funding for social welfare programs at the federal level. This led to a shift of responsibility for these programs to the states, which received block grants with less restrictive guidelines. However, this also resulted in a reduction in overall funding for social welfare and a lack of consistency in services across different states.
Mandatory funding is set by laws and must be spent on specific programs, like Social Security. Discretionary funding is decided by Congress each year and can be adjusted. Mandatory funding limits flexibility in budgeting, while discretionary funding allows for more control over spending priorities.