Was increased funding for social programs part of the reaganomics?

Funding for Social programs. Most "liberals" would be in favor of less defense spending and higher corporate taxes.

Public funding is funding that is provided by the government. Many social programs designed to help people receive public funding.

No-this would be unconstitutional. There is some federal funding for school programs and for social services programs, however.

Some economists and critics have blamed the widening gap between the rich and the poor on Reaganomics. His tax cuts and other policies gave additional money to the rich. He cut social programs, increasing the depth of poverty and promoted "Trickle Down Economics".

Reaganomics. Illegal drugs.

The three goals of Reaganomics were to lower taxes, higher defense spending, and curtailed spending for social surfaces. Reagan's plan to help the economy.

Budget cutz in social programz

The most common use of income taxes is for social security. Other uses include military funding and law enforcement. Taxes are the government's way of funding programs to help the people.

Nixon's new Federalism enhanced and hurt the federal social programs because although the standards were raised for these programs, there was not enough funding to cover all the expenses of it. - See more at: http://www.chacha.com/question/what-ways-did-nixons-new-federalism-both-enhance-and-hurt-federal-social-programs#sthash.usyPCgDf.dpuf

The social issues that effect New Jersey include a lack of funding for federal programs, gay marriage, social security, and improving public education and health care. There are also high taxes paid to live in New Jersey, even though many social programs have been cut.

Conservatism is opposed to increased government programs to solve social problems; I could also mention libertarianism which is even more opposed to government involvement in social problems than conservatism is.

These programs have worked very well in providing security to senior citizens. However, due to increased life span and expansion of eligibility, neither program is actuarially sound and, lacking changes in eligibility and/or funding, both will eventually run out of money.

Some care homes can be considered social care. Care homes can opt to take part in Medicare and Medicaid funding programs. As Medicaid is generally provided to the poor, these care homes would fit under the terms of social care. But not all care homes opt into Medicare and Medicaid programs.

Programs such as Social Security and Medicare are called social insurance programs, and fall under the general umbrella of welfare programs.

No, Cuba does have a few social programs that eat up funding, such as free health care and education.

Reaganomics (identified with the 40th President, from 1981 to 1989) was referred to as "supply side" economics (or the critical label trickle down) because its primary aim was to increase capital and capital expenditures, intending to fight a slowing economy and eventually increase government revenue. The policies were centered on large, broad tax cuts and smaller cuts in the spending budgets for social programs.

These programs meet national needs - it's simply not practicable to have 50 different versions of the US Marine Corps, or Social Security for that matter! BTW, altho the Feds provide most of the funding, the States administer Medicaid.

The problems within the Social Security Administration are not from the agency itself. The problems are the politicians who believe that SS funding can be used for other government programs and have stolen close to $1 trillion in the last 10 years. Thank You Democrats.

Different counties and states have various funding programs to help with childcare. Talk to the academic counselor at your school for information on childcare options. Also, call Social Services in your area for program details.

are programs that are intended to help/assisst families

federal programs that exemplifies social structure for juveniles

One change that Ronald Reagan made to welfare was by making a lot of the financial responsibility the states responsibility. He wanted the federal government to stop funding social welfare programs.

Socialists do not oppose raising taxes to pay for social programs. It is important to note, however, that supporting social programs does not make one a socialist.

funding water conservation technologies

Rather than eliminating services and cutting spending, it increased social welfare programs.