answersLogoWhite

0

In the past, infant mortality was much greater than today. In Victorian times, for instance, the norm was for large families, mainly to ensure that at least some would survive to adulthood.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What was the life expectancy in 1911?

In 1911, the average life expectancy was around 50 years old. This was mostly due to higher infant mortality rates and lower medical advancements compared to today.


If you were born in 1900 your life expectancy was approximately?

If you were born in 1900, the life expectancy was around 47 years. This was due to higher infant mortality rates and lower medical advancements compared to today.


What was the life expectancy in 1928?

The average life expectancy in 1928 was around 57 years old. This was influenced by factors such as limited medical advancements, higher infant mortality rates, and lower overall healthcare standards compared to today.


What was the life expectancy in 1756?

In 1756, life expectancy was around 30-40 years. This average was lower than today due to higher rates of infant mortality, infectious diseases, and limited medical knowledge and technology.


Why was the life expectancy in the past lower than the life expectancy today?

Life expectancy in the past was lower due to a variety of factors including higher infant mortality rates, limited medical knowledge and technology, higher prevalence of infectious diseases, poor sanitation, and lack of access to adequate nutrition and healthcare. Improvements in healthcare, sanitation, nutrition, and technology have contributed to the increase in life expectancy today.


Africa today has the highest what in the world?

I believe its Highest infant mortality and lowest life expectancy rates.


Developing countries account for how much of the world population increase today?

Developing countries account for the majority of the world population increase today. This is due to factors such as higher birth rates, improved healthcare leading to lower mortality rates, and advancements in technology and infrastructure.


What was the life expectancy approximately of an Englishman born in 1815 after Waterloo?

The life expectancy of an Englishman born in 1815 after the Battle of Waterloo was around 40 years. This estimate takes into account factors such as high infant mortality rates and lower life expectancy compared to modern times. Despite advancements in healthcare and living conditions during the early 19th century, life expectancy was still significantly lower than it is today.


What was life expectancy in 1640?

Life expectancy in 1640 was significantly lower than it is today, with a global average of around 30-40 years. Various factors such as high infant mortality rates, limited medical advancements, poor sanitation, and frequent wars contributed to the lower life expectancy during that time period.


What is the average life span of someone in 1348 in England?

In 1348, the average life span in England was significantly lower than today, typically around 30 to 40 years. However, this average was heavily influenced by high infant mortality rates; those who survived childhood could expect to live into their 50s or 60s. The onset of the Black Death later that year further drastically reduced life expectancy due to widespread mortality.


What was the average age of death 2000 years ago?

The average age of death 2000 years ago was significantly lower than it is today. Life expectancy in ancient times was much lower due to factors like high infant mortality rates, limited medical knowledge, and harsh living conditions. It is estimated that the average age of death was around 30-35 years old.


What was the life expectancy during the Renaissance?

Life expectancy during the Renaissance was around 30 to 40 years old, although this varied by region and social class. Factors such as high infant mortality rates and limited medical knowledge contributed to the lower life expectancy compared to today.