No, it was an entirely unreasonable act.
For me, he died as he lived: torturing and killing innocent people.
After the first World War, in order to gain power and leverage, Hitler needed someone to blame for all the trouble Germany had landed themselves into, due to being shouldered with massive reparation payments. The Jews were a majority in bank owners, and a general thought of antisemitism was prevalent at the time.
The concept of innocent until proven guilty is generally considered more just and fair than guilty until proven innocent. This is because it places the burden of proof on the accuser and protects individuals from being wrongly accused or convicted.
The Jews have been treated very fairly in the U.K.
Free the Jews
Jews range from fair-skinned to dark (such as the Yemeni Jews and others). And by the way, to which "Hebrews" do you refer?
A fair trial in court. Innocent until proven guilty.
racism between the Nazis and the Jews were shown as the Nazis were the superior race with blue eyes, blonde hair and fair skin known as the Aryans while the Jews were stereotyped as the inferior race as valued as low creatures such as fleas and pests. Hitler believed that it was because of the Jews that the German people had suffered the loss of world war 1 and by removing every single Jew from this earth, the world would be a better place to live in.
Hitler and Stalin, methinks. shadowdmdm: Probably hitler as he commanded most of that murdering although Stalin did a fair amount as well
A fair public trial is essentially when a person is treated and believed to be innocent until they are proven guilty in a trial that is void of prejudice, bias, and unfair treatment.
Adolf Hitler did not want Jews to become Aryans (his mythical Nordic blue-eyed blond race), he wanted the Jews to be expelled or killed and for Aryans to become the dominant and only race in Germany.
Yes, that is probably a fair statement to make, but not all Jews believe that, and in fact, not all Jews believe in God.