There is no definitive answer to whether King Tibni was good or evil, as historical accounts vary. Some sources portray him as a legitimate claimant to the throne, while others depict him as a rebel against the rightful ruler. It ultimately depends on the perspective from which his actions are viewed.
King Tibni was a good king. For proof download the watchtower CD Rome and search him up.- By Nathan
if you are evil you have to go to the king of swordhaven and if your evil you will have to do the same but to the Queen of Skullholme.
King Authur was a good King who turn out to fight in a war.
one who has great power of good and evil
Romans 7:21 - I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me. (KJV)
There is no such thing as "good evil." Evil is the opposite of good.
No, King Haraada wasn't evil, he just wanted to be King of England as well as King of Norway. He had a good claim to the thrown, as the thrown of England had been passed to him originally from King Cnut (pronounced Coonute) who took the thrown from the King before him. Harald battled Harold because Harold was the King then.
if you are evil and whant a good rank you go to the king and buy a good reputation if you are nomad you choose it at chapter 2
Not very evil.
Maybe King Alteon doesn't want you back!
The concept of gods being evil is subjective and varies across different religions and belief systems. Some people may see certain gods as evil based on their actions or the way they are portrayed in myths or scriptures. Ultimately, the perception of gods as good or evil is influenced by individual beliefs and perspectives.
evil