Business
Yes and No. You see, the two families didn't know they were married until after they were both dead. Personally, I think that the death is what brought them together (not necessarily the marriage). If by marriage, you mean love between Romeo and Juliet, then yes the love united the families.
A committed relationship could simply be an agreement between two people. Marriage is a legally binding arrangement, licensed by the state.
franchise
a contractual business attangement between a manufaturer and a dealer is called a FRANCHISE
B: Franchise
Some do have large families others choose not to have children, its a decision made between marriage mates.
In the Elizabethan times love wasn't taken into acount, marriage was a chance and form of alliance between families. Marriage was therefore done to keep peaceand as a business oportunity (especially since a dowry had to be paid).
"There was strong interrelation between the two families, mostly by marriage."
families want to avoid dividing land between brothers.
The history of marriage goes back many centuries and has different variation between cultures. In some parts of the world, it was decided very early whome children would marry and there was no way out of it. Families often married of children to weathier families or became partners with families to extend their wealth. Religion made marriage a sacred bond between two people.
There were slave marriages, but they did not depend on Roman law, they depended upon the master's okay. The marital arrangement for slaves was called "contubrium" and a marriage between freedmen and slaves was called "concubinatus".There were slave marriages, but they did not depend on Roman law, they depended upon the master's okay. The marital arrangement for slaves was called "contubrium" and a marriage between freedmen and slaves was called "concubinatus".There were slave marriages, but they did not depend on Roman law, they depended upon the master's okay. The marital arrangement for slaves was called "contubrium" and a marriage between freedmen and slaves was called "concubinatus".There were slave marriages, but they did not depend on Roman law, they depended upon the master's okay. The marital arrangement for slaves was called "contubrium" and a marriage between freedmen and slaves was called "concubinatus".There were slave marriages, but they did not depend on Roman law, they depended upon the master's okay. The marital arrangement for slaves was called "contubrium" and a marriage between freedmen and slaves was called "concubinatus".There were slave marriages, but they did not depend on Roman law, they depended upon the master's okay. The marital arrangement for slaves was called "contubrium" and a marriage between freedmen and slaves was called "concubinatus".There were slave marriages, but they did not depend on Roman law, they depended upon the master's okay. The marital arrangement for slaves was called "contubrium" and a marriage between freedmen and slaves was called "concubinatus".There were slave marriages, but they did not depend on Roman law, they depended upon the master's okay. The marital arrangement for slaves was called "contubrium" and a marriage between freedmen and slaves was called "concubinatus".There were slave marriages, but they did not depend on Roman law, they depended upon the master's okay. The marital arrangement for slaves was called "contubrium" and a marriage between freedmen and slaves was called "concubinatus".
This question can not be answered, however, I will say why. Your question is about the 'stakeholders" in a gay marriage, but that would imply that gay marriage is a business. There are no stakeholders in a marriage, as their are in a business, you don't sell stock and have shareholders or stakeholders. Gay couples and Gay Marriage is not property that can be measured in "stock" or "stakeholder". Marriage is a partnership between two people, not a business or a piece of property that can be measured.