No.
It's false.
NovaNET!
~Mickey
Carter's way of dealing with the Iran hostage crisis made him look ineffective to many people. Also he was a Washington outsider as were most his close advisers. He had many ideas on how to make government better, but he did not know to deal with the politicians and bureaucrats that control things and so he could not make things happen.
President Carter and Reagan.
jimmy carter was a smart and successful president, he was a great leader for our country.
He looked weak and ineffective. *APEX*
He was effective
Jimmy Carter was the president from Georgia.
president carter president carter
Jimmie Carter (although he couldn't pronounce "nuclear"!)
Not only won it, but by the largest margin ever for a non-incumbent president. The US had been undergoing high inflation, high unemployment, high interest rates, fuel shortages, and was being attacked by militant forces in Iran. Carter was seen as a weak and ineffective leader.
Jimmy Carter was elected president of the USA on January 21 1977. Robert Mugabe was elected president of Zimbabwe after Carter. The next President of the USA was Ronald Reagan.
Jimmy Carter did nothing that indisputably bad. There was a hostage situation in Iran and he authorized a rescue mission that failed. His political enemies said that a good president would probably have seen a way to keep the hostages from ever being taken and once they were taken would have used effective measures to get them out. They claimed that the hostage situation was just one more indication that Carter was weak and ineffective in dealing with unfriendly foreign governments.
no he is not