Yes, it was.
It permitted slavery north of the mason-Dixon line in areas of the Louisiana Purchase
True, slavery was prohibited North of the Ohio River after 1820. The Missouri Compromise prohibited slavery in the former Louisiana Territory north of the parallel 36°30' north except within the boundaries of the proposed state of Missouri.
After the Missouri Compromise of 1820, slavery was legal in states that were south of the compromise line (36°30’ parallel), such as Arkansas, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas. This line permitted slavery in states below it while prohibiting it in states above it.
Slavery was not permitted in the Ohio territory. The Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which established the Northwest Territory, including what would become Ohio, prohibited slavery in the region.
yes
The document that said slavery was not permitted in any area won from Mexico was known as the Wilmot Proviso.
Slavery had expanded into the Louisiana Territory in 1818, when the Missouri Compromise was declared by Henry Clay.
before January 1863
They were concerned that slavery would come 2 kansas
Slavery was prohibited in the Michigan Territory through the Northwest Ordinance of 1787. In contrast, slavery was permitted in the Arkansas Territory until it was admitted to the Union as a state in 1836.
Henry Ellis.
No