Response to what? At present the question cannot be answered.
It depends entirely to what they were responding to and whose sense of justice you wish to use.
No, physical violence is not justified as a response to someone getting in your face. It is important to try to de-escalate the situation and seek help from authorities if necessary.
Joseph Goebbels publicly blamed the Jews for Kristallnacht, claiming that it was a spontaneous reaction by the German population to the assassination of a German diplomat by a Jewish refugee. He portrayed it as a justified response against Jewish economic and social influence in Germany.
Why as mrs. Johansen's response to the german soilder so clever
The German phrase Òmach schnellÓ means something like Òhurry up!, make it quick!, do it fast!, speed up!Ó A good response in German might be ÒIch beeile michÓ which mean ÒI am hurryingÓ.
Left justified
U-boat warfare was the German response to the British blockade.
German and british actions against venezuela (Apex)
lol you got wendells class too eh??
The colonial response to the Stamp Act of 1765 was one of widespread opposition and protest. Colonists argued that the Act violated their rights as Englishmen, particularly the principle of "no taxation without representation," since they had no representatives in Parliament. This led to the formation of groups like the Sons of Liberty, organized protests, and boycotts of British goods. Ultimately, the backlash contributed to the repeal of the Stamp Act in 1766, highlighting the growing tension between the colonies and Britain.
no, not at all.. in my opinion, it is not justified in interning enemy aliens as this is not their fault that they have come from enemy countries i.e japan German and Italy......they have paid taxes for Australia....they are separated from their families for this and now they are not Japanese, Germans or Italians....THEY ARE AUSTRALIANS.. so, therefore the answer is no....
Yes, the colonists were justified in their response to the Stamp Act. This legislation imposed direct taxes without colonial representation in Parliament, which violated the principle of "no taxation without representation." Their protests, including boycotts and the formation of groups like the Sons of Liberty, reflected a legitimate grievance against what they perceived as oppressive British rule. Ultimately, these actions helped galvanize a movement toward independence.