From the front it was near impossible. Because of the length of the spears it lacked flexibility and maneuverability, it could easily be flanked and it was vulnerable from the rear. Yes it was effective, but it had its limitations.
The Romans eliminated the Greek phalanx and replaced it with the maniple, which was a looser, more mobile fighting unit.The Romans eliminated the Greek phalanx and replaced it with the maniple, which was a looser, more mobile fighting unit.The Romans eliminated the Greek phalanx and replaced it with the maniple, which was a looser, more mobile fighting unit.The Romans eliminated the Greek phalanx and replaced it with the maniple, which was a looser, more mobile fighting unit.The Romans eliminated the Greek phalanx and replaced it with the maniple, which was a looser, more mobile fighting unit.The Romans eliminated the Greek phalanx and replaced it with the maniple, which was a looser, more mobile fighting unit.The Romans eliminated the Greek phalanx and replaced it with the maniple, which was a looser, more mobile fighting unit.The Romans eliminated the Greek phalanx and replaced it with the maniple, which was a looser, more mobile fighting unit.The Romans eliminated the Greek phalanx and replaced it with the maniple, which was a looser, more mobile fighting unit.
About 500 to 600 people were in a Phalanx.
The Phalanx was reformed and made into one of the most effective fighting forces in the Ancient World by his father Philip II. They are a military unit armed with 12 metre long spears (known as the Sarissa). Trained in various manouvers and formations, they were crucial to his success. Alexander the great was never defeated.
Greek armies primarily utilized the phalanx formation, a tactical approach where heavily armed infantry soldiers, known as hoplites, stood shoulder to shoulder in a dense line. Each soldier carried a large shield and a spear, creating a formidable wall of protection and offensive capability. This method emphasized discipline, cohesion, and the collective strength of the unit, allowing them to effectively engage and overpower their enemies in close combat. Additionally, Greek forces sometimes employed cavalry and skirmishers to complement the phalanx in battle.
That's a rectangular mass military formation, usually composed entirely of heavy infantry armed with spears, pikes, sarissas, or similar weapons.
Methods and tactics were the differences. To simply, the phalanx was a spear thrusting, close formed body, which, at some time in the battle, used a pushing method with their shields called "othismos". The Romans, although the very, very, early Roman army used the hoplite method of fighting, soon graduated to the maniple, which was a more mobile fighting unit. They also relied more on their swordsmanship than the long hoplite thrusting spear. With the maniple, the lines were not as closely packed and there were spaces for the rear lines to move up and relieve the front lines, in this way giving the Romans more staying power in battle. The maniple could also be split, giving the Roman commanders extra tactics to use in battle.
The unit of hydrograph for an infinitesimally small duration of effective rainfall is called unit hydrograph. It represents the response of a watershed to a unit input of effective rainfall over time.
sparta
Drachma
Drachma
Foreign Legion
The legion was a complete Roman fighting unit. It was the largest sub-unit in a Roman army. It consisted of 4000 to 6000 men and was divided into cohorts, centuries, cavalry and auxiliaries.The legion was a complete Roman fighting unit. It was the largest sub-unit in a Roman army. It consisted of 4000 to 6000 men and was divided into cohorts, centuries, cavalry and auxiliaries.The legion was a complete Roman fighting unit. It was the largest sub-unit in a Roman army. It consisted of 4000 to 6000 men and was divided into cohorts, centuries, cavalry and auxiliaries.The legion was a complete Roman fighting unit. It was the largest sub-unit in a Roman army. It consisted of 4000 to 6000 men and was divided into cohorts, centuries, cavalry and auxiliaries.The legion was a complete Roman fighting unit. It was the largest sub-unit in a Roman army. It consisted of 4000 to 6000 men and was divided into cohorts, centuries, cavalry and auxiliaries.The legion was a complete Roman fighting unit. It was the largest sub-unit in a Roman army. It consisted of 4000 to 6000 men and was divided into cohorts, centuries, cavalry and auxiliaries.The legion was a complete Roman fighting unit. It was the largest sub-unit in a Roman army. It consisted of 4000 to 6000 men and was divided into cohorts, centuries, cavalry and auxiliaries.The legion was a complete Roman fighting unit. It was the largest sub-unit in a Roman army. It consisted of 4000 to 6000 men and was divided into cohorts, centuries, cavalry and auxiliaries.The legion was a complete Roman fighting unit. It was the largest sub-unit in a Roman army. It consisted of 4000 to 6000 men and was divided into cohorts, centuries, cavalry and auxiliaries.