Yes, in some ways
it is a part ofa castle
The tapestry was completed, it appears, shortly after the events it portrays, but lost for many centuries before being discovered in Bayeaux Cathedral. It is not actually a tapestry at all, but an embroidery.
The main king was the inventor of Walker crisps and the other was the manager of the Cadburys factory.
It is very biased making William look better
the Bayeux tapestry was biased because...It was written in William's perspectiveIt was produced by nuns who were not part of the Battle, and therefore they would have just based their knowledge by hearing it.The tapestry was build in France (Normandy) meaning that all the information used to make the tapestry was passed on by others and had probably been changed along the way.
He was shot in the eye by a Norman soldier-this is what it shows on the bayeux tapestry however nobody actually knows as it could be a biased account as only the Normans produced it.
A tapestry is a piece of woven work, the bio tapestry was not woven therefore it can't be a tapestry and instead is a embroidery.
An example of a medieval tapestry is the Bayeux tapestry, which was all about the battle of hastings
We do not trust the Bayeux Tapestry because it was written from a Norman point of view, this means that the Normans could have exaggerated their victory or left out great things that the Saxons did. They did this to make themselves sound greater and more powerful than they actually were. As a result of this, it made viewers think of the Normans as alot better than the Saxons.
tapestry ancestry vestry
The Bayeux Tapestry shows what most people think is what happened in the battle of hastings. There could be the problem that it might be biased. The Winners might have changed the story to make it sound like they had an even better victory than they did.
That depends on which tapestry. I'm going to guess you're asking about the Bayeux Tapestry, which depicts the Battle of Hastings in 1066.