No. When the Constitution was written it contained almost nothing that guaranteed any rights to the citizenry. Several colonies refused to ratify the Constitution until it did, so the first ten amendments were added.
No. It was proposed to cover the holes left in the Constitution, which resulted from changes in the society and politics since the first establishment of it.
no it wasn't
It did not contian the Bill Of Rights.
it did not guarantee basic rights
Massachusetts
They proposed a series of amendments to guarantee citizens' rights.
In the late 1700s, many people felt the proposed Constitution of the United States did not go far enough in protecting the fundamental principles of individual rights, putting ratification of the Constitution in danger. The first ten amendments to the Constitution, known as the Bill Of Rights, were proposed as a means of obtaining the votes necessary to ratify the Constitution.
In the late 1700s, many people felt the proposed Constitution of the United States did not go far enough in protecting the fundamental principles of individual rights, putting ratification of the Constitution in danger. The first ten amendments to the Constitution, known as the Bill of Rights, were proposed as a means of obtaining the votes necessary to ratify the Constitution.
They proposed a series of amendments to guarantee citizens' rights.
They proposed a series of amendments to guarantee citizens' rights.
Equal Rights Amendment, an amendment to the U.S. Constitution proposed in the early 1970s but never ratified
The Anti-Federalists disliked the proposed Constitution because they thought it created a federal government with too much power. The inclusion of a Bill of Rights was a compromise to ease their concerns.