If you consider the death of 25% of the world's popualtion to be a disaster, then yes it was.
The Black Death was caused by the spread of the Yersinia pestis bacteria carried by fleas on rodents, particularly rats, and transmitted to humans. While it was a devastating pandemic, it is considered a disease outbreak rather than a natural disaster like earthquakes or hurricanes.
There is no specific human disaster recorded on March 20, 1345, in history. It was a period marked by various challenges like the Black Death in Europe and conflicts, but none are directly linked to a significant disaster on that date specifically.
Death is a part of life itself, albeit the last part. It is not a disaster by any definition on its own.
The most devastating natural disaster in Europe during the late 1300s was the Black Death, a bubonic plague pandemic that swept through the continent between 1347 and 1351. The disease is estimated to have killed between 75-200 million people in Europe, causing widespread social and economic disruption.
This is a bit off the Q. but basically, When disaster strook ( when the black death arrived) twenty five million people died from it. If you type it into google, you will be able to find many answers but i cant help you otherwise THANK YOU FOR CHOOSING ME!!
The disaster is the death injury and destruction it caused/. It nearly wiped out the city of Darwin.
no because the biggest change came on the farms.for thise peasants who survived,there was a brighter futre.because they could move around and find jobs for more money.
The Black Plague
I think, Tsunami.
The Black Death, or bubonic plague, is considered one of the worst natural disasters in European history. It swept through Europe in the 14th century, causing widespread death and devastation. It is estimated to have killed between 75-200 million people.
Another name for the plague is the black death
the black death