Correct; it wasn't a war at all, simply a term used to define an arms race between the communists and the free world.
Cold war=No war.
Cold war
No. Nukes created the cold war.Perhaps they kept the cold war cold, but they did not create it! Without them it is very likely it would have become a hot war before Stalin's death.
there once was a war that state early in the 1700 there blood everywhere but not
they adapt by sucking blood from animals in order to nourish eggs without the blood
there cold blood there cold blood there cold blood
Yes, it is recommended to warm the blood before transfusing someone with cold agglutinin. Cold agglutinins are antibodies that can cause the red blood cells to clump together in cold temperatures, potentially leading to blockages in blood vessels if transfused without being warmed. Warming the blood helps prevent this complication and ensures a successful transfusion.
A hot war is most dangerous to the army combatants and civilians, but a cold war can do just as much damage to the countries involved without a weapon being fired.
The Korean War proved to the Communists that the US was willing to spill it's own blood to stop them.
cold blood
There is (was) only one reason. The A-Bomb. Without the A-Bomb...there would have been no cold war. The "bomb" created a situation in which TOTAL declared wars could no longer be fought without "the risk of mutually assurred destruction" to all peoples involved. Translation: Cold War.
It probably doesn't; since the Constitution was written a century and half before the advent of atomic weapons. Atomic weapons (nukes) created the cold war. Without nuclear weapons there would have no cold war.