No- not all Southerners were pro-slavery, just like not all Northerners were anti-slavery.
No. The southerns were the ones who started slavery where as the north prohibited it. The southern started slavery especially around the Civil War.
Union troops (the ones fighting against slavery)
If by "slavery supporters" you mean Quantrill's Raiders and you're referring to Lawrence, KS, then the answer is yes. The raid was at least partially in retaliation for the sacking of Osceola, MO by "Jayhawkers" (Kansans who were against slavery but not necessarily against a little robbery and assassination, as long as they were the ones doing it).
Consult an attorney! They are the ones with the expertise to help you out. There will be an answer that has to be provided to the charges.
The whigs from the North were known as Conscience Whigs and those of the South were known as Cotton Whigs. The ones in the north opposed slavery except for the factory owners, which liked slavery die to the cheap cotton. the Southern Whigs supported slavery and wished to expand it into the territories.
In the US Civil War, the South had a number of advantages. Perhaps one of the best ones was the fact that they did not have to conquer the North to win. Their goal for independence would come when the North no longer wished to continue the conflict.
I can not imagine that any thoughtful person in the North or South approved of what went on in Kansas or thought in hind-sight that the idea of letting the people vote on slavery was a good idea. The abolitionists who moved to Kansas with the sole intent of voting against slavery were mostly from the North and probably thought they doing something noble and heroic. The pro-slavery people who came up from Missouri to disrupt the election were no doubt considered to be the ones to blame for the bloodshed .
They enjoyed games of Truth or Dare, chase the Elephant(aka Fatguys) and badminton.
The South depended totally on the cotton trade, which needed slave labor. The North was rapidly industrialising and had no use for slavery. The difference in attitude could be summed-up like this. When the slavery debate really started to heat-up in the 1850's, both sides put pressure on the churches to preach the official line. Northern ministers preached that slavery was an ungodly system, and a sin against humans created in the image of Our Lord. Southern ones preached that slavery was a perfect God-given arrangement of man and master.
No, the non payment of ones debt is a civil matter not a criminal one.
They had A Navy Resources Factories More States Probably plenty more but these were the big ones
Many in the South supported and benefited from the practice of slavery, viewing it as essential to their economic system and way of life. They believed in the racial superiority of white people and saw slavery as a legitimate institution. However, opinions on slavery varied among individuals and were not universal throughout the region.