0
The Roman army was the greatest fighting machine that the world had ever seen. Yes, you could say that they were good at fighting.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Were the Romans very good at fighting?
They had very good tactics and weapons, and just look how big the Roman Empire was.
How did the Roman army compare to the rest of the world?
The Roman Army Compared To The Rest Of The World? the Roman army was very advance and was very startegic compared to the rest of the world
Why won the roman army so many battles?
because they had a very good tactic and very goog armore.
Why was the standard bearer impotant to the Roman Army?
The Standard bearer was very important in the roman army because the soldiers were very trust worthy and very experienced as they had their own emblem.
Do the roman army have any break?
As no Roman army exists you could say they are having a very long break presently
Is the Portuguese army a good army?
very good
How important were auxiliaries within the roman army?
very
How did the roman expansion in the Mediterranean?
Roman expansion into the mediterranean was the begin of a dominating empire. Though the Romans were thought to be a very army-centric, they were actually very defensive. They though their best defense would be a good offense. So before another army could be a threat to them, they comanded and conquered.
How did the roman expansion in the mediterranean affect rome?
Roman expansion into the mediterranean was the begin of a dominating empire. Though the Romans were thought to be a very army-centric, they were actually very defensive. They though their best defense would be a good offense. So before another army could be a threat to them, they comanded and conquered.
What was Harold's army like at the battle of hastings?
Harold was very unlucky in The Battle of Hastings because his army was poorly disciplined and they were very tired because they had just been fighting in the North. You can tell that his army were badly disciplined because whenever William's army pretended to retreat, Harold's army followed, meaning it was easy for them to be killed. Harold however, was a good leader just due to the failure of his army he was not able to use them as best as he could.
What people thought about the Roman army?
they were fit and healthy and also very brave
What was a disadvantage for the South in fighting the Civil War?
Not a very big army- most of the population was slaves
