Not as a rule. Lincoln and Cleveland were strong, in my opinion. McKinley and Hayes were perhaps average. Fillmore, Pierce, Buchanan, Johnson, Grant and Benjamin Harrison were weaker.
Yes
A strong central government
Type your answer here...foreign influence.
His general Archelaus assembled a strong fleet which dominated the Aegean Sea.
In the 17th century, the most powerful nation was often considered to be the Dutch Republic, particularly during its Golden Age in the early to mid-1600s. It dominated global trade, had a strong naval presence, and established a vast colonial empire. However, France, under the leadership of Louis XIV later in the century, also emerged as a significant power, showcasing military strength and cultural influence. England was rising as well, especially towards the century's end, setting the stage for its eventual prominence.
People vote for male presidents because they think they are strong and more willing to do things for their people and they the women are weak and are dull so women get less or no votes.
The presidents "role: has evolved/changed over the last century plus in this country. Traditionally the president should enforce the constitution and safeguard American liberties and freedoms. However presidents in the last century have sought to take a more active role in government than our founding fathers ever intended., but it should be noted that congress has been complicit in this "evolution" of the Imperialist American Presidency> It goes across party lines it is not a right or left issue but an American issue that must be remedied by strong leadership of our Congress.
In the eleventh century
Presidents generally considered to have been strong and effective leaders typically viewed the presidency as a stewardship. This sentiment was made popular by Theodore Roosevelt.
Enrico broadened Pepsi's profile and established the company as a strong competitor in many of the markets that Coca-Cola had traditionally dominated.
furthered the idea of strong chief executive
Chester Arthur was a strong supporter of civil service reform in the 19th century.