answersLogoWhite

0

Was the shroud or Turin found after Jesus death?

Updated: 8/17/2019
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Best Answer

Yes; it didn't exist before his death.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was the shroud or Turin found after Jesus death?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Did the French fake the Shroud of Turin?

Yes. The French did fake the Shroud of Turin because we know Jesus was real as was his shroud. Modern scientists have found that it was from medival times because it was during that time that the French copied it.


Where was Jesus' shroud found?

The Shroud of Turin, believed by some to be the burial cloth of Jesus, was found in Turin, Italy. It has been a subject of controversy and debate, with scientific analysis yielding inconclusive results about its origins and authenticity.


How did the shroud of turin get famous?

The Shroud of Turin (or Turin Shroud) is a linen cloth many believe is the burial cloth of Jesus. It shows the image of a man who has the markings of being crucified. It dates back long before photography, and no traces of colored pigments in the cloth (the sign of dye or paint) have been found. The shroud is famous because it is a religious (or non religious, whatever your standpoint is on this matter) mystery that still continues to puzzle the world. Let me know if you discover the truth!


Is there another burial cloth containing the same blood found on the Shroud of Turin?

AnswerNo. The 'blood' found on the Shroud of Turin has been analysed and found to be tempera paint containing red ochre and vermilion along with traces of rose madder - the pigments used by medieval artists to depict blood.


Is the Turin shroud a painting?

No - it's a stained bit of cloth, thought to be a shroud. (that's cloth wrapped around a dead body).-----------Scientists have studied the shroud using X-ray flourescence and infrared thermography, as well as sponging the shroud with 25 different solvents, without finding any evidence of paints or pigments. Other scientists said they have found pigments on the shroud. (I guess the only way to know which scientists to believe is to study the shroud yourself.)


What is the Shroud of Turin made from?

The actual material of the shroud is linen, produced around 1250-1390 CE. In 1988, three laboratories (at Oxford, Zurich, and the University of Arizona) used accelerator mass spectrometry to carbon-date samples of the shroud, all arriving at approximately the same age. Microanalyst Walter C. McCrone examined tape-lifted samples from the shroud and identified the supposed blood as tempera paint containing red ochre and vermilion along with traces of rose madder. The shroud is made of linen which was used 2000 year ago.


Are there any artifacts from Jesus' crucifixion?

AnswerThere are no genuine artefacts from the crucifixion of Jesus. In fact, until the fourth century, no one ever appears to have been interested in knowing the whereabouts of any such artefacts. Then, in the fourth century, Emperor Constantine attempted to convert the entire empire to Christianity and would spare no expense in doing so. His mother, Helena, visited Palestine and found, to her own satisfaction, a whole range of important sites and artefacts associated with the birth and death of Jesus. She miraculously found, buried but intact, the three crosses on which Jesus and the two others were crucified and was even able to identify which cross was that of Jesus. Part of the 'True Cross' have been distributed throughout the ancient empire, leading some to suggest that all the pieces would make several crosses.The Shroud of Turin, one of several shrouds touted in the Middle Ages as the original shroud in which Jesus was wrapped, has now been conclusively been demonstrated to be a relic from the twelfth century. If it really is the cloth in which Jesus was wrapped, this creates a serious problem for the authenticity of John's Gospel, since the Gospel says that there was a separate cloth placed over Jesus' face (John 20:7), in line with first-century practice, whereas the image on the Shroud of Turin clearly represents Jesus as being wrapped in a single cloth.Another artefact of dubious provenance is the original crown of thorns.


What was the significance of the linen clothes at the tomb of Jesus?

The linen clothes at the tomb of Jesus were significant because they were left behind when Jesus rose from the dead, indicating that he had physically left the tomb. This detail is mentioned in the Bible as evidence of his resurrection.


In what was Jesus' body wrapped in?

Jesus was wrapped in linen cloths after he died. He was then placed in the tomb from which He rose later. The cloths were found still rolled in the shape of the body.


Why birth is there if death is truth?

Death is a curse, it isn't "truth." Truth is found in Jesus Christ.


Who found Turin shroud?

Original answer: It is kept safely in Italy Turin. but it is not the cloth that wrapped the body of Jesus as it is much younger in age. New answer: Yes, the Shroud of Turin is in the Cathedral of Saint John the Baptist in Turin, Italy. However, new technologies suggest that the radio carbon testing done in 1988 that originally placed the Shroud around the 1260 to 1390 time frame is in fact inaccurate. There is currently a large consensus that the Shroud could be from the time of Jesus and has been further analyzed to reveal pollens imbedded throughout the linen found only within a 50 mile radius of Israel at that time.


Is the Shroud of Turin a miracle or are Scientists wrong?

Another answer from our community:Modern science has been proved to be wrong many times, but in this case they weren't. The phenomenon of the Shroud of Turin being made in medival times is false, because the body of Jesus didn't decay in the Shroud, thus not expelling the nutrients that scientists studied to detect the Shroud's age. The body of Jesus was found roughly three days after it being placed in the tomb to be gone. Scientists used the wrong method in finding the Shroud's age, so the ansewer is that scientists were wrong about the Shroud's age.