No, it was not because they thought that he is an idiot.
No, the theory of a supercontinent was initially met with skepticism by scientists when it was proposed by Alfred Wegener in the early 20th century. It was not widely accepted until the 1960s, when advancements in plate tectonics provided more evidence to support the idea.
Because it appeared to fit the facts as far as they could be ascertained (as with any theory).
When German meteorologist Alfred Wegener first published his theory on Pangea (super continent) he was widely ridiculed for it. Some of the reaction to his theory on continental shift and a super continent was actually quite hostile. The idea was first put forward in 1912 but it wasn't until the 1950's that his idea was really rethought. By then evidence of continental drift was starting to support his ideas.
When German meteorologist Alfred Wegener first published his theory on Pangea (super continent) he was widely ridiculed for it. Some of the reaction to his theory on continental shift and a super continent was actually quite hostile. The idea was first put forward in 1912 but it wasn't until the 1950's that his idea was really rethought. By then evidence of continental drift was starting to support his ideas.
Caralous linnaeus theory is accepted theory of speciation
When it was originally proposed people thought it was impossible but then with further evidence provided and research since then it is an accepted theory.
Either Asia or Europe
The theory of evolution was accepted by scientists in 1859, Darwin's first book was published the same year that his theory was accepted.
One reason of how they was NOT is : Africans crossed into South America when Africa and South America were one continent.
cell theory is accepted today because it is a unit of living organism.
No, not until later was this theory proven and supplemented by the theory of plate tectonics.
a theory