There was no need.
Michael Jackson's familyUntil a DNA test is done to prove otherwise, Michael is the father, and if they are not biologically his, it doesn't matter; he loved them, and to them, he is their dad.
They might have had one done in private, although they probably haven't because someone would have told the press about it by now.
In his DNA he is! Yes he is black man
No she is not, DNA test proved it
There will never be a DNA test done because there is no need, he isn't Michael's son, he was just a friend.
No, she had a hair cut and instead of leaving the hair on the floor security took it away in case someone tried to use it for a DNA test, there is no DNA happening but they are aware that someone might have taken it for that purpose.
Sons usually do carry their father's DNA. DNA is used to prove evidence in paternity as well as crimes. The test may not be as accurate as a test of the man's own DNA would have been but will be an indication. If you know the deceased's blood group and this is the same that could be a reason to do a test of DNA but it is quite expensive.
I believe they are, they definitely have certain features that say their his. But why does it matter? As long as he was a good loving father to them, biology shouldn't even matter. Its amazing how the media are saying they're not his without even having a DNA test conducted though...
Yes, get a court order for a DNA-test and he have to do it.
The DNA test result is positive.
Yes, a toothbrush is perfect for a DNA test.
A maternal DNA test compares the DNA of a child to that of their mother, while a paternal DNA test compares the child's DNA to that of their father. This helps determine biological relationships between individuals.