answersLogoWhite

0

No. Although urine was used for several things in ancient Rome, cancer curing was not one of them. This is because the Romans had no concept of cancer. They knew of painful tumors, that's all.

No. Although urine was used for several things in ancient Rome, cancer curing was not one of them. This is because the Romans had no concept of cancer. They knew of painful tumors, that's all.

No. Although urine was used for several things in ancient Rome, cancer curing was not one of them. This is because the Romans had no concept of cancer. They knew of painful tumors, that's all.

No. Although urine was used for several things in ancient Rome, cancer curing was not one of them. This is because the Romans had no concept of cancer. They knew of painful tumors, that's all.

No. Although urine was used for several things in ancient Rome, cancer curing was not one of them. This is because the Romans had no concept of cancer. They knew of painful tumors, that's all.

No. Although urine was used for several things in ancient Rome, cancer curing was not one of them. This is because the Romans had no concept of cancer. They knew of painful tumors, that's all.

No. Although urine was used for several things in ancient Rome, cancer curing was not one of them. This is because the Romans had no concept of cancer. They knew of painful tumors, that's all.

No. Although urine was used for several things in ancient Rome, cancer curing was not one of them. This is because the Romans had no concept of cancer. They knew of painful tumors, that's all.

No. Although urine was used for several things in ancient Rome, cancer curing was not one of them. This is because the Romans had no concept of cancer. They knew of painful tumors, that's all.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?