The actors did not belong to Shakespeare, who was not even the leader of his theatrical company, so they were not really "Shakespeare's actors." You might call them Burbage's actors, maybe. Anyway, yes, some of the actors in the company were quite young. The company hired young boys as apprentices to learn the trade, and before their voices broke, they played the parts of young women who had high voices.
Young boys.
Little Girls, or rather young women. Shakespeare has no characters who are prepubescent girls. That would be a waste of the relatively scarce boy actors. However, the boy actors did play young boys, such as Prince Arthur in King John, or King Edward V in Richard III or Mamillius in A Winter's Tale.
Actors. Before 1660, only actors and no actresses performed in the plays.
Actors. The performers in any play are called actors.
They All were male actors
Young boys.
Himself
In the morning. They performed in the afternoons.
Young boys played the role of women.
In his time, young boys did the role of ladies.
Actors during the time of Shakespeare were viewed as rowdy, licentious, and untrustworthy.
Little Girls, or rather young women. Shakespeare has no characters who are prepubescent girls. That would be a waste of the relatively scarce boy actors. However, the boy actors did play young boys, such as Prince Arthur in King John, or King Edward V in Richard III or Mamillius in A Winter's Tale.
Actors. Before 1660, only actors and no actresses performed in the plays.
Actors. The performers in any play are called actors.
The female roles in Shakespeare's day were performed by Boy Players: young actors who had not yet reached puberty and therefore did not have masculine voices. Some of the Boy Players were Apprentice Actors, the modern equivalent would be Interns.
Shakespeares plays where preformed by very famous and good actors in the globe theatre. -elz-
They All were male actors