Little Girls, or rather young women. Shakespeare has no characters who are prepubescent girls. That would be a waste of the relatively scarce boy actors.
However, the boy actors did play young boys, such as Prince Arthur in King John, or King Edward V in Richard III or Mamillius in A Winter's Tale.
No, women's roles were played by young boys, although at times women would dress up as men to be allowed to play women's roles!
I don't know what Elizabeth you are speaking of, but I presume it was because she was a female Shakespearean actress who was acting after the year 1660 sometime. Sometimes actresses play the male roles in Shakespeare as well.
purely because that is what most of Shakespearean characters were, boys! hope this helped you.
Females were not allowed to play on stage so men and boys played all the female roles.
Yes, women weren't allowed to act.
In Shakespeare's time, all female roles were played by young boys or men because women were not allowed to perform on stage. This was a common practice due to societal norms and restrictions at the time.
No, women's roles were played by young boys, although at times women would dress up as men to be allowed to play women's roles!
Young boys, girls and young women. Yes, the boys also played boys, like Mamillius in The Winter's Tale, Prince Arthur in King John, Edward V and his brother the Duke of York in Richard III, the young Duke Humphrey in Henry IV Part 2, Falstaff's boy in Henry V and so on.
I don't know what Elizabeth you are speaking of, but I presume it was because she was a female Shakespearean actress who was acting after the year 1660 sometime. Sometimes actresses play the male roles in Shakespeare as well.
purely because that is what most of Shakespearean characters were, boys! hope this helped you.
Drummer boys were used to send messages to the soilders.
Females were not allowed to play on stage so men and boys played all the female roles.
Yes, women weren't allowed to act.
Ophelia
Shakespeares "Othello"
hamlet
The audience