No. Many were German POWs for example.
because they were looking after their own people
If someone refuses to invest in his/her own future, how can you call them "victims". Either do or don't, but in the end you are responsible for your own future.
all the people in Jamaica that own cars
Like any group of people engaging in genocide, the Nazis did not consider the Holocaust victims to be "their own people". In order to engage in this type of killing of a group of people, it is necessary to cast them as different, and indeed, less than human. This can be seen in the extermination of native populations in America, recent mass murders in Rwanda and Darfur, the killings of Kurds in Iraq in the 1980s, etc. So when President George Bush was making the argument that Saddam Hussein "gassed his own people" (referring to the Kurds), it's worth noting that while that was technically accurate, Hussein did not consider the Kurds to be "his own people". In the same way, Nazis did not consider the victims of their own mass murders to be "their own people".
no not all people like her, people have their own opinions
they are responsible for their own tragedies because their actions cause them to die
they are responsible for their own tragedies because their actions cause them to die
Mostly because of gods.
none, they all own Bugattis :D
We are all unique
Victims precipitate 0% of all homicides. The decision to commit the crime is ALWAYS made by the perpetrator and always precipitated by that person. No matter how dumb, naive, careless, greedy, or even guilty of a crime the victim may be, the person who decides to commit the crime against them is still the perpetrator and the person who was subject to the crime is still the victim. The percentage of occurrence that the perpetrator is the only victim of their own crime is negligible, and that person is still the perpetrator.What is the percent of victims that precipitate all homicides?
Some people can, all it takes is a flexible back.