Sometimes yes. See the following.
http://www.YouTube.com/watch?v=UpT1fz1sElg&eurl=http://www.websitetoolbox.com/tool/post/mulattodebate/vpost?id=3254640&feature=player_embedded
Because they had "white" in them, some slave owners treated them better for this, why many did not. The reason they would not is because they would not want to acknowledge the fact that they had had sexual intercourse with an "inferior" being.
They were all treated differently and poorly by the white people.
Europeans had little regard for the slaves' lives and treated them terribly
let just say they treated the Indians like they were nothing and like slaves.
badly, they were put into slavery. the americans treated them like dirt..they got sent directly to plantations to become a slave. they were whipped, punched, slapped etc. slaves had no respect. it was not fair.
Slaves were generally treated very well. They were expensive and if you wanted them to work good, you wouldn't abuse them. Think of buying a new car. After investing all that money, would you take it out and beat it?
Slaves were treated differently because they were viewed as property or objects to be owned and exploited for labor. This dehumanizing perspective allowed owners to subject slaves to harsh and inhumane treatment without legal repercussions. The economic interests of slave owners also played a significant role in perpetuating the unequal treatment of slaves.
Female slaves were often subject to additional forms of exploitation and abuse compared to male slaves. They were frequently victims of sexual violence by their masters and were also expected to perform domestic duties in addition to physical labor. Additionally, female slaves were at a higher risk of forced separation from their families and children due to slave trade practices.
Slaves that were half black and half white were called Mulatto.
They were treated differently in different city-states, such as Sparta (Which is where I am from) called them hoplites and didn't really care about their slaves, they were usually prisoners of war, they treated them harshly and were beaten on occasion when they did something bad or wrong, and they were at the bottom of the hierarchy. Athens treated slaves more respectfully but they were still at the bottom of the hierarchy.
They were all treated differently and poorly by the white people.
Slaves in Brazil were subjected to harsh treatment, including physical abuse, long hours of labor, and poor living conditions. Many faced violence, exploitation, and separation from their families. Slavery in Brazil was abolished in 1888.
The slaves were not treated good at all I guess you can try to imagine jail now and then multiply it by 100 and then you will see how the slaves were treated.
Slave owners justified owning slaves by dehumanizing them and believing that they were inferior. They also relied on economic reasons, such as profits from slave labor, to support their ownership. Additionally, societal norms and laws at the time normalized and supported the institution of slavery.
Mayan slaves were typically treated poorly, subjected to harsh working conditions, physical abuse, and inadequate living conditions. They had limited rights and freedoms, often forced to work in agriculture, construction, or domestic service. Slavery was an important aspect of the Mayan economy and society, with slaves being considered the property of their owners.
Women and slaves were treated unfairly because they were not allowed to be citizens,vote, and did not have any rights.there were no slaves in Sparta, and the women were treated with dignity.
Women and slaves were treated unfairly because they were not allowed to be citizens,vote, and did not have any rights.there were no slaves in Sparta, and the women were treated with dignity.
how were the slaves treated in the cape