were the mexicans well-prepared for the battle of puebla
he was well prepared for the fight and his army was well trained.
he was quite well prepared for the battle as he had many plans, many men and almost the same number horses.
king Harold was not prepared for the battle but the Normandy were well prepared. the reason why king Harold was not prepared was that he had another battle before the battle of Hastings.After he won the battle of Stamford bridge that was between him and Harald hadrada, he got to know that the Normandy had arrived England and he had to march 226 miles(363 km) for another battle. king Harold had lost his best men in the war and part of Harold's men were left behind on the way for the battle of Hastings. he also didn't have enough weapons.while king Harold was fighting in the battle of Stamford bridge, the Normandy built a castle. they had enough weapons and had men on horseback so the Normandy were really prepared and that's the reason why the Normandy won the battle of Hastings and that's the reason why William, duke of Normandy became the king of England
None, that was a battle between French troops and Mexicans in Mexico. However, it is believed that France was intending to use Mexico as a base to support the confederate army, which could have altered the entire outcome of the American Civil War. The battle of Puebla was a major victory for revitalizing the Mexican army to force the French out of their country.
They prepared really badly...
They had a well trained army and a two to one numerical advantage.
Well, Cinco de Mayo means in Spanish the 5th of May, but the Battle of Puebla which the holiday commemorates happened in 1862.
He prepared for battle well and organised as he was well set up with horsemen and swords, and archers with arrows. They were hardworking well trained and very skilled.
he was well prepared for the fight and his army was well trained.
He could taste the bannan in his pants so he knew
he was quite well prepared for the battle as he had many plans, many men and almost the same number horses.
king Harold was not prepared for the battle but the Normandy were well prepared. the reason why king Harold was not prepared was that he had another battle before the battle of Hastings.After he won the battle of Stamford bridge that was between him and Harald hadrada, he got to know that the Normandy had arrived England and he had to march 226 miles(363 km) for another battle. king Harold had lost his best men in the war and part of Harold's men were left behind on the way for the battle of Hastings. he also didn't have enough weapons.while king Harold was fighting in the battle of Stamford bridge, the Normandy built a castle. they had enough weapons and had men on horseback so the Normandy were really prepared and that's the reason why the Normandy won the battle of Hastings and that's the reason why William, duke of Normandy became the king of England
No. He knew all too well that his new army was not ready for operations. But he was pushed into it by the politicians and the press, who thought there ought to be some action.
None, that was a battle between French troops and Mexicans in Mexico. However, it is believed that France was intending to use Mexico as a base to support the confederate army, which could have altered the entire outcome of the American Civil War. The battle of Puebla was a major victory for revitalizing the Mexican army to force the French out of their country.
Well, some Mexicans come to the United States for jobs, but Those are Mexicans.
Well, the date when the Mexicans stopped bombardment and fully attacked the Alamo with the Texans in it was the 6th of March in 1836. The whole battle was February 23, 1836-March 6,1836.
The Jordanian army is stubborn but always well prepared, as for the mesopotomian army, it always struck into battle without training.