Want this question answered?
There are many things that are can arguably be in favor of the League of Nations. The League of Nations had many social successes by educating nations on the problems of drug smuggling and drug addiction.
The League of Nations was supposed to do many things, but first and foremost was to prevent another world war, which it failed to do.
heres no such thing. they are two separate things
The League of Nations had no armed forces, and had no means of punishing other countries that engaged in things that the League of Nations was created to defeat, like embargo, military buildups, antagonism between nations, etc. In other words, it had no teeth
NATO replaced it and it has helped the world to do many things that may not have gotten accomplished.
There were multiple factors that contributed to the failure of the League of Nations, and it would be overly simplistic to solely blame America. While the absence of US involvement and the failure of the Senate to ratify the Treaty of Versailles were significant, other factors, such as the lack of enforcement mechanisms and the inability to effectively address the rise of aggressive powers like Germany and Japan, also played a role in the league's failure.
For many things. one is that he is the dictator of North Korea. Another one he's better known for is his involvement in the restart of the making of nuclear weapons and threatening other nations with the use of them.
The League of Nations was the first major attempt to create an international organization that could prevent war, and even though it failed, it was still an inspiration for the next attempt, the United Nations, which has done many important things even though it also has failed to prevent a great many wars.
The most likely nation that british would come to is the one that has the most wanted things in their nation because british does not have many things to live from.
Woodrow Wilson went to the table of the Treaty of Versailles with an agenda of creating the League of Nations. The nations of the world wanted to talk about their agendas not his 14 points. They were after revenge, retribution and admission of guilt when his agenda was peace and democratic ruling nations and alliances for his agendas. They basically had to promise him he would get his league if he got the Germans to sign the their Treaty and agreed to sign it too. He went back home and things changed while he was gone. He had to compromise. The US did not become part of the League because the US Congress did not go along with it. see related links below.
Woodrow Wilson went to the table of the Treaty of Versailles with an agenda of creating the League of Nations. The nations of the world wanted to talk about their agendas not his 14 points. They were after revenge, retribution and admission of guilt when his agenda was peace and democratic ruling nations and alliances for his agendas. They basically had to promise him he would get his league if he got the Germans to sign the their Treaty and agreed to sign it too. He went back home and things changed while he was gone. He had to compromise. The US did not become part of the League because the US Congress did not go along with it. see related links below.
Woodrow Wilson went to the table of the Treaty of Versailles with an agenda of creating the League of Nations. The nations of the world wanted to talk about their agendas not his 14 points. They were after revenge, retribution and admission of guilt when his agenda was peace and democratic ruling nations and alliances for his agendas. They basically had to promise him he would get his league if he got the Germans to sign the their Treaty and agreed to sign it too. He went back home and things changed while he was gone. He had to compromise. The US did not become part of the League because the US Congress did not go along with it. see related links below.