0
What A scientist makes the argument that she has found DNA evidence that shows that evolution does not exist. What would her evidence have to show for her to be correct?
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Was Darwin's theory of evolution correct?
yes
Theory on the evolution of the state?
Evolution - a unifying principle of biologyThe theory of evolution states that modern organisms are descendants of ancient organisms and that modifications accumulated over time explain the apparent changes and differences among modern forms of life. This 'descent with modification' theory was central to Charles Darwin's argument of biological evolution, an idea spearheaded by Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744-1829). The idea of evolution proposes that animals and plants can change over time, and are not static forms created at once and independent of each other. Lamarck and Darwin proposed different explanation of how these changes may occur. Darwin's proposal of natural selection has proved correct and evidence from biology, earth science, and cosmology all corroborate the basic mechanism of natural selection.
What is an example of a big-picture feedback?
big black juicy oily men
Why do people believe in the theory of evolution?
Answer 1Because they accept the myriad of evidence that underlines the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection.Answer 2Because they relied on evidences, observations, experiments. These are the basic premises of sciences. For an idea to be called a 'theory' in science required more evidences and tests, etc. A theory in science means more than what most lay people realize. A hypothesis in science is closer to what lay people think of as a 'theory' in daily usage. So when you hear the Theory of Evolution, there is substantial evidence behind it, just like there is for the Theory of Relativity or Theory of Gravitation.On the other hand, just because something has lots of evidence behind it does not mean it's correct. However, it takes a lot of counter-evidence to overturn a theory. Remember, it took a long time and substantial evidence to change the theory that the earth was not the center of the universe.
What are the six scientific advances since Darwins death that have provided support for the theory of evolution?
There is nothing newly or old that support Darwin's evolution theory.Some of scientists reject Darwin's Theory of evolution and some of them don't. t I personally support it fairly due to my own beliefs and other scientist reject it for their on. Don't think that what you read in the Internet is always correct. The edge of science will always be on debate. Let me note that Darwin lived in another era and the ability of explaining natural laws was not even close than the way we can explain it today. So for me he earned my respected.
Is evolution science or hypothesis?
Evolution is both: it began as a hypothesis by a scientist who, after some research and thought on the matter, came up with the idea. Since then, that hypothesis has been recognised as a theory, as further evidence came to light supporting the idea and predictions - which were developed based on existing evidence and what the some of the gaps might be - were made, then tested and shown correct.
How does observed evolutionary change support the scientific theory of evolution?
The theory predicts that evolution will happen and in certain ways. The observed evolution makes this prediction correct. It also defines evolution as happening, and as such is perfect evidence in support of it.
What is it important to scientist to put limitations on their work?
To have correct evidence to his work .And to prove his work and aim of his work;
What is the correct way to spell argument?
Argument is the correct spelling.
What is the correct spelling for argument?
argument
How do you spell siencetist?
The correct spelling is "scientist."
The purpose of the body paragraphs is to provide evidence to support your thesis statement?
Yes, that's correct. Body paragraphs expand on the main points of your thesis statement by presenting arguments, examples, and evidence to strengthen your argument and persuade the reader. Each body paragraph typically focuses on a single idea or piece of evidence to effectively support the main argument.
What is correct there were no evidence or there was no evidence?
There was no evidence.
How do you spell scientist?
That is the correct spelling of the word "scientists".
Logical fallacies redirects the audience's focus from the actual argument to the character of the person supporting it?
Yes, that's correct. Logical fallacies are errors in reasoning that can weaken an argument by shifting attention away from the evidence and reasoning presented, and instead focusing on irrelevant or misleading information about the person making the argument. It's important to be aware of these fallacies to ensure that arguments are based on solid logic and evidence.
How do you spell argument?
Argument is the correct spelling (disagreement, dispute, legal contention).
There appears to be growing evidence of paranormal phenomena and that it does in fact exist so how can this fit in with biology and evolution?
It would be interesting to see this "proof" (correct term: evidence). No scientific investigation - and there have been plenty - has ever turned up any such evidence of paranormal phenomena. If and when it found something which was claimed as such, there was a perfectly rational and overly natural explanation. Since there is no such evidence, there is no way paranormal activity fits into the framework of any branch of biology, including evolution.
