i am not sure about this question
Indian
Yes, Trade on the Silk Road was signification the development of the Indian sub-continent.
no, the silk road was NOT covered with silk The "Silk Road" was the "road" which silk traveled from Asia to Europe.
No the Silk Road was not smooth. The Silk road was actually a road that was used for trading. The main item traded along the Silk Road was silk that is why it is called the silk road.
Both were trading routes between Europe and the far east. The silk road carried silk to Europe, while the Indian Ocean carried spices part of the way from Pacific islands and neighboring countries to the middle east for trans shipment to Europe.
The eastern silk road is mostly desert and the western silk road is mostly mountains
The Silk Road was a route not a road and it wasn't made of Silk either. You can always call it the Silk Route.
The Silk Road was a series of routes that came off of the main Silk Road. The Silk Road consisted of the main Silk Road, minor routes and sea routes which were used later in the Silk Road's history, when the Silk Road became dangerous.
The Silk Road is a trade route that links Europe and Asia together. The Indian Ocean trade routes link India, west Africa, and Europe together. Although they are different in that the Indian Ocean trade is overseas and the Silk Road is overland, they are the same in that they both spread religion, and they both traded goods to Europe.
Paris was not part of the silk road the last stop in the Silk Road was Rome.
The invention of ships and a silk road by sea declined the Silk Road.
the silk road is approximately 6,437 kilometers and 4,000 miles