Want this question answered?
Although the UN took a more active role in recognizing the atrocities in Darfur, it had little impact in either case.
Although the UN took a more active role in recognizing the atrocities in Darfur, it had little impact in either case.
Although the UN took a more active role in recognizing the atrocities in Darfur, it had little impact in either case.
Failure of the UN in Rwanda was caused by a lack of:resources,political will to take it in commitment andcommunication within the system.
*Rwanda
Eugene-Richard Gasana
The super powers did not intervene in Rwanda because it has become the custom to have the UN intervene instead. Unfortunately the UN usually sits on its hands and does very little.
Although the UN took a more active role in recognizing the atrocities in Darfur, it had little impact in either case.
It really did not have a huge affect on the world. The UN came to help but that was it. Their were the UNAMIR efforts to help. The genocide in Rwanda was left in Rwanda and neither the U.S or Europe clamed to help.
MIllions of hutus and \tsustis would have lived
an international fly
'un langage international'