Want this question answered?
Possibly. If the business refuses to authorize the charges, the card user could be held responsible. If the card user signed an agreement of accountability, he will definitely be held responsible. Your best course of action is to try to work with the business who contracted the card to resolve this.
Minnesota is not a community property state, so the answer is generally no. However, if the funds are in the account as a result of a fraudulent conveyance to evade payment of taxes, action could be taken to recover them. Errors do happen, of course. As long as you are married to someone who does not pay their taxes, you do have to worry.
You can drill down to transaction management functions.
If you're drawing funds from an account - it is a debit action.
A bank account can only be "frozen" via a valid court order. Such action is generally taken by the account holder(s) not the judgment creditor. The reason being that the funds in the account are jointly held and one or more account holders are not the judgment debtor.
Responsible to you means you have a responsibility that is all your own to this person. Responsible for you means that you are acting on behalf of someone but they have some responsibility in the action.
Irresponsibility describes a lack of responsible action.
If and when someone sees it, the answer will be deleted and the account that posted it will be reviewed for further action.
how are they responsible for their actions as a congressman?
Mn2+ ion is responsible for the catalytic action
Yes i do...
An example of a company action which was legal, but not socially responsible might be the dumping of items into the trash that can still be used. Retailers follow this practice to get rid of inventory they cannot sell. It is wasteful to just throw this merchandise away when it is still usable by someone.
* What do we want to do? * Who is responsible for doing it? * How do we communicate with each other? * What is the procedure if someone is injured?
In most cases, yes. The creditor is not likely to try to separate charges on jointly owned accounts, the exception would be if there were some legal action and one of the account holders requested a division of debts, which might or might not be allowed. If the question refers to an authorized user rather than a joint account holder, an AU is not responsible for any debt incurred on an account, their only responsbility is to repay the account holder.
peristalsis
the invasion of Ethiopia
If the debt is less that seven years old and if the spouse was a joint account holder, then the spouse would be responsible for the debt. If, however, it was a separate account or the surviving spouse was only an authorized user on the account, they are not responsible for the debt. * The 7 years relates to the length of time that the information can remain on the credit report. There is no time limit on debt collection only on the amount of time that the creditor has to pursue legal action to recover money owed (debt statute of limitations). You would be responsible for a joint account only, although it is not unusual for creditors to attempt to collect from authorized user's whether or not they are a spouse of the account holder.