vestigial organs such as a tail bone in humans and a hip bone in whales. also, the skeletal structure of wings of birds, flippers of whales, and hands of humans are all very very similar in structure.
For a scientist to argue that evolution does not exist based on DNA evidence, her findings would need to demonstrate that genetic mutations do not occur, that species do not share common ancestry, and that there is no evidence of natural selection influencing genetic variation over time. This would contradict the vast body of scientific evidence supporting the theory of evolution.
Anatomy is a useful tool in gaining evidence for evolution. The most useful thing is to examine homologous structures, ie anatomical similarities between different species. The best example of this is the pentadactyl limb. It is found in humans, dolphins and bats. This shows that at some point in the past there must have been a common ancestor from which these 3 diverse groups of animals evolved.
There is strong support for the theory of evolution due to fossils that have been found by archeologists. The fossil records show evidence of evolution over billions of years.
Paleontology, evolutionary biology, molecular cell biology, biochemistry, geology, genetics, biogeography, evolutionary development and so on and so on. The evidence is there in massive amounts. talkorigins.org To start your search. Many links there. NCSE ( National Center For Science Education ) is also a good source.
Biogeography.
The discipline of biogeography.
Ballsacks, or scrotums, are a natural anatomical feature found in male mammals, including humans. They are not invented but rather a result of evolution and biological development.
Recent research findings, such as genomic studies that show patterns of genetic similarities among different species, provide evidence supporting Darwin's theory of evolution. These studies have revealed the common ancestry of all living organisms and how species have evolved over time through natural selection. Additionally, fossil evidence continues to be found that further corroborates the theory of evolution by showing transitional forms between different species.
They have the evidence yet they will never be convinced while under the influence of a ideology that lies to them. To them evolution is not only false it is evil and their view of evolution is so skewed by this ideological nonsense that there is little hope for this generation of creationists, though we may save some of their children. Most religions made peace with evolution a long time ago, but creationists, being literalistic, must have every word of the bible be true as if one thing is not true then all is not true. Dichotomous thinking such as this is the mark if the unintelligent and uneducated.
A supporting sentence typically provides more details, examples, or explanations to back up the main idea or topic of a paragraph. It could include specific evidence, statistics, facts, or anecdotes that help strengthen the overall argument or point being made.
It would probably be superseded by a thesis founded on more credible scientific evidence.
Many religions have been changed overtime by scientific facts either supporting them or proving them wrong. For example, many scientists believe and support the hypothesis of evolution. Proven evidence may change the way someone looks on their own religion. If scientists found the holy grail and all other sorts of artifacts people would believe in Christianity more because of the evidence supporting it.