In response to your basic question - yes as woman does not have to have sexual intercourse with a man to become pregnant. But the sperm from a man is needed for in-vitro fertilization.
AnswerNo, not unless she has been raped, even then, she has had the use of a man to conceive the child.Well, technically speaking, none. But, due to certain human technology, chickens, ducks and geese are now able to produce unfertilized eggs, which we eat. The fertilized eggs (normally laid eggs, that is) are used to hatch more chickens, ducks or geese for eating, or for more egg production. Also it depands whether you count a bacteria as a animal as they clone each other by using asexual reproduction.
There are certain lizards and fish that do not require a male to produce offspring. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/24/opinion/24shubin.html?n=Top/News/Science/Topics/Zoos
It is not known exactly how many animals reproduce without mating.
I don't know! My cousin is so cute and hot!!!!!!!
Parthenogenesis, a type of asexual reproduction, is achieved by various species. Aphids and daphnia are two particular species that use parthenogenesis.
I believe in vitro fertilization would be cost-prohibitive for hamsters.
aphids (insect) blue skink (reptile)
No. The father must be of type A if the child is and the mother is not.
Yes. Child will be either AO or BO and either rh positive or negative depending on the genetics of the father.
25% for blood type O, 50% for blodd type AB, and 25% for A.
If you're a woman, then any kid that you've given birth to is your biological child. If you're a man, then any kid that came from you getting a woman pregnant is your biological child. But adults may also adopt children, born and sired by someone else. These will then be just as much their kids in the eyes of the law, but they won't be their biological children.
It depends on who the person is. If it were an average man and average woman, a man would probably win. I'm saying that because most men tend to be stronger than women but in different ways. If it were a weak man and a strong woman the woman would most likely win. If it were a strong man against a weak woman the man would probably win. If it were a strong man and strong woman, it would depend on their smarts speed and strength.
yes
i think not!
Yes, a couple can still have children. A man and a woman are needed to reproduce and create a child. However, adoption is an option for a couple who can not conceive.
A man cannot conceive and give birth to a child as woman and genital organs are different from man and woman.According to Bible, God created Adam from the earth and breathed life into him. God put Adam to sleep, removed a rib from Adam and created Eve.Islam believes man and woman are unique creations of Allah and that woman was created from man.
A woman, without her, man is nothing. or A woman without her man, is nothing.
yes. chances of getting a normal child is 50/50
There are 560 ways.
Woman. Without her, man is nothing. Woman without her man, is nothing.
Yes.
One of them can have a baby with a woman and then the other man can adopt the child. To make a baby you need a sperm and a egg so 2 men can not physically make a baby together without a woman.
Lesbians can conceive a child just like a straight woman. The only difference is that being lesbian, her partner is "of course" unable to get her pregnant. If a Lesbian couple wish to conceive then they have a couple of options. Though they must have the same basic ingredient, male sperm. The how is up to the individual. More than likely the woman will choose to go somewhere to be artificially inseminated, the other option is to have sex with a man, though being lesbian, then insemination would probably be the first choice.
I got 4 different ways but I'm probably wrong...