answersLogoWhite

0

The basis for a good debate.

User Avatar

Madisyn Hayes

Lvl 13
3y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What are dissenting opinions and concurring opinion?

The basis for a good debate.


Who were the concurring and dissenting justices for Morse v Frederick?

You can take a look at the opinions at the link below.Justice Thomas wrote a concurring opinionJustice Alito wrote a concurring opinion in which Justice Kennedy joinedJustice Stevens wrote a dissenting opinion in which Justices Souter and Ginsberg joinedJustice Breyer wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part


What are the types of court opinions?

Majority, Concurring, Dissenting, and Per Curiam


How does dissenting opinion differ from a concurring opinion?

Dissenting means you disagree concurring means you do agree


How does dissenting opinion differ from concurring opinion?

Dissenting means you disagree concurring means you do agree


What does it mean when the Supreme Court hands down its decision?

often a mixed decision with majority, dissenting, and even concurring opinions.


What is the differences between a dissenting and a concurring opinion?

Concurring is that of agreeing; dissenting is that of disagreeing. And I learnt this in 30 seconds off Google, using 'define:...' -- google it first. -.-


When the supreme court rules on a case how many opinions might be written to explain the verdict?

There is no mandated limit; however, the practical limit would be nine -- one for each member of the Court. Only one opinion may be submitted as the official opinion of the Court; however, each justice is free to write a dissenting or concurring (or dissenting in part and concurring in part) opinion as part of the legal record. While concurring and dissenting opinions are unenforceable, they may be cited as precedent in future cases and sometimes become more influential than the original opinion of the Court.


What are the type of opinion?

Majority, Concurring, Dissenting, and Per Curiam


What do one or more justices write when they disagree with the majority?

A Justice may write a dissenting opinion if he or she votes against the majority and wants to record his or her legal reasoning for consideration in future cases. Dissenting opinions, although written in opposition to the majority, or Court Opinion, may be cited as precedents in future litigation. An opinion that agrees with the decision in the case (although not necessarily the reasoning) is called a concurringopinion.For more information on opinions of the Court, see Related Questions, below.


What are descending opinions and concurring opinions?

Descending opinions, often referred to as dissenting opinions, are written by one or more judges who disagree with the majority's decision in a court case, providing their reasoning for the disagreement. Concurring opinions, on the other hand, are written by judges who agree with the majority's outcome but have different reasoning or additional points to emphasize. Both types of opinions serve to clarify legal reasoning and can influence future cases or legal interpretations.


Do supreme court justices write their own concurring and dissenting opinions or do their clerks do it for them?

It is my understanding that Justice John Paul Stevens writes the first draft of all of his opinions, but that the others rely on assistance from their law clerks to varying degrees. There is probably no definitive answer to this question.