The basis for a good debate.
The basis for a good debate.
You can take a look at the opinions at the link below.Justice Thomas wrote a concurring opinionJustice Alito wrote a concurring opinion in which Justice Kennedy joinedJustice Stevens wrote a dissenting opinion in which Justices Souter and Ginsberg joinedJustice Breyer wrote an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part
Majority, Concurring, Dissenting, and Per Curiam
Dissenting means you disagree concurring means you do agree
Dissenting means you disagree concurring means you do agree
often a mixed decision with majority, dissenting, and even concurring opinions.
Concurring is that of agreeing; dissenting is that of disagreeing. And I learnt this in 30 seconds off Google, using 'define:...' -- google it first. -.-
There is no mandated limit; however, the practical limit would be nine -- one for each member of the Court. Only one opinion may be submitted as the official opinion of the Court; however, each justice is free to write a dissenting or concurring (or dissenting in part and concurring in part) opinion as part of the legal record. While concurring and dissenting opinions are unenforceable, they may be cited as precedent in future cases and sometimes become more influential than the original opinion of the Court.
Majority, Concurring, Dissenting, and Per Curiam
A Justice may write a dissenting opinion if he or she votes against the majority and wants to record his or her legal reasoning for consideration in future cases. Dissenting opinions, although written in opposition to the majority, or Court Opinion, may be cited as precedents in future litigation. An opinion that agrees with the decision in the case (although not necessarily the reasoning) is called a concurringopinion.For more information on opinions of the Court, see Related Questions, below.
Descending opinions, often referred to as dissenting opinions, are written by one or more judges who disagree with the majority's decision in a court case, providing their reasoning for the disagreement. Concurring opinions, on the other hand, are written by judges who agree with the majority's outcome but have different reasoning or additional points to emphasize. Both types of opinions serve to clarify legal reasoning and can influence future cases or legal interpretations.
It is my understanding that Justice John Paul Stevens writes the first draft of all of his opinions, but that the others rely on assistance from their law clerks to varying degrees. There is probably no definitive answer to this question.