0
What else can I help you with?
How many kingdoms are used today?
there are five kingdoms used today
What are the five kingdoms that scientist recognize?
Fish, mammels, birds, reptiles and amphibians x
How many kingdoms are recognized by the scientific community?
The scientific community recognizes six kingdoms: Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, Protista, Archaea, and Bacteria. These kingdoms are used to classify and group living organisms based on their shared characteristics and evolutionary relationships.
How did the Peace of Westphalia weaken the Catholic Church's power?
It recognized the right of kingdoms to practice Protestantism.
What are the type of kingdoms?
There are five kingdoms. They areMoneraProtistaFungiAnimaliaPlantae
Which kingdoms are prokaryotic and Eukaryotic?
There are 6 kingdoms recognized in America today. Only one kingdom is considered to be prokaryotic, and that is Bacteria. The other five fall under eukaryotic: Fungi, Protists (Algae and Protozoa), Animalia, Chromista, and Plantae.
How many kingdoms contain eukaryotic organisms?
Four. These are Protista, Fungi, Plantae and Animalia. This is in accordance with the Five-Kingdom system.
What are the six kingdoms currently recognized for classification?
The six kingdoms currently recognized for classification are Animalia, Plantae, Fungi, Protista, Archaea, and Bacteria. These kingdoms are based on their characteristics, such as cell structure, mode of nutrition, and reproduction methods.
5 kingdoms why no 6?
because the five kingdoms have been split up in to 5 very vague categories, and are able to explain all of the following five kingdoms,
What kind of cells are bacterial cells?
A bacterial cell is a type of monera, one of the five kingdoms. There are five kingdoms, in which we are in Anamalia.
How many bacteria kingdoms are there today?
There are two kingdoms of bacteria, Eubacteria and Archaea.
Why do some scientists believe that the five kingdom approach is inadequate?
The three domains have superseded the five kingdoms. Using molecular studies it has been suggested that the evolutionary of today may need to be re-examined.
