Want this question answered?
If a healthy human clone would exist (they don't as of yet, since cloning is quite difficult to do and human cloning is illegal in most nations), it would need to eat. This is because the clone is still a human being and as such it has the same basic needs such as food, oxygen etc. It will also have feelings and be capable of thought just like any other human.
NOOOOOOOOO!!! THis is same either way around. This is because cloning, not to mention the fact that we clone hundreds of times wrong before we clone right, but cloning gives the exact same genes to the receiver. This will decrease genetic diversity, and all of humans would be destroyed because we would get dumber after every clone, and a disease would kill much more because we didn't have enough genetic diversity
If it were possible to create human beings by means of asexual reproduction, possibly we would want to have genetically identical offspring of exceptionally talented people such as Albert Einstein, or John Lennon, etc. Possibly we would create huge clone armies. Possibly there would be fewer people who feel the need to practice sexual reproduction. Possibly the world would become even more overpopulated than it already is.
Astronomers and astrologists.
I would say 'Oh No, another poor relation looking to me for support." Opinion 2: I say "Oh great, another person to spam wikianswers.com with stupid questions that really shouldn't be answered."
I'm fairly certain human cloning is illegal in most places, but considering there was a clone of you, they would be a human being and as such killing them would be murder.
No, becuasse when you clone a human then they have no feelings and the clone will get beat up and probably die. SO, therefore, cloning a human would be totally... useless. Cloning is dangourus because it enharets the same genetic mutation as the person before it, therefor meaning if a person got arthuridus at 15 the clone would have it when it was born. if they cloned a 30 year old woman and she had kidney problems and acholhal problems, when her clone is born it would need achohol to survive, and it would have kidney problems.
If a healthy human clone would exist (they don't as of yet, since cloning is quite difficult to do and human cloning is illegal in most nations), it would need to eat. This is because the clone is still a human being and as such it has the same basic needs such as food, oxygen etc. It will also have feelings and be capable of thought just like any other human.
No humans have been cloned yet. Should a human ever be cloned, then presumably, the clone would be identical (genetically) to the original from which it is copied; thus, it would be a human.
I would clone myself
I would clone myself
No you would not get hurt.
Of course
It's mostly to do with ethics and laws. Imagine if you were to clone yourself. Would the clone have rights? Would it be a citizen? What if you killed it, or it killed you?
A clone would be a twin made by science
The human race can be cloned. Theoretically. The public is unaware as to whether various governments around the world have already started cloning humans. There is a large debate in progress about the morality of such an action. Who are we to recreate human life? It also brings religion into the topic as well. Does a clone have a soul? Can a clone think? How would it react to being a clone? There are too many questions to be answered before cloning a human can be attempted. If it hasn't been already. Try reading House of the Scorpion, a fictional novel that deals with the morality of cloning and the growth of a clone to adulthood.
It is really expensive to clone a human. It can cost anywhere from $1.7 million to $2.0 million. Cloning is not available to the public as of now. Wait a few years and you never know.