Want this question answered?
A bee is definitely matter.
Cold is not a matter, it is a characteristic of a matter (a low temperature).
Yes they all are matter because every thing in the world is made out of matter. Also because heat is a solid, water is a liquid, bacteria is a liquid, and oxygen is a gas.
White matter
Niether; matter cannot be created (increase in matter) nor destroyed (decrease in matter) following the Law of Conservation of Matter.
The Federal Rules of Evidence generally exclude hearsay statements unless they fall within an exception. Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, and it is generally considered unreliable evidence due to its potential for distortion or inaccuracy.
Excited Utterances (statements by witnesses and victims during or immediately after a "startling event")Existing mental, emotinal or physical condition (not offered for truth of the matter asserted)Statements for medical diagnosis or treatment (primarily used in child abuse cases)Reguarly kept records (business records, public records, learned treatises)Dying declaration (declarant makes statement concerning cause of death, while believing that his death is imminent; declarant is unavailable for trial)Statement against (penal) Interest (Incriminating admission or confession admitting involvement in crime)
All Mater is solid
Air composes matter.
Hearsay really is a matter of who is testifying at trial, who is the 'declarant' or the person that is saying the words being quoted at trial, and what are you trying to show by offering the statement as evidence - evidence of what. I don't know of any evidentiary rule that applies specifically, and in all cases, to statements made by law enforcement. If the defendant is testifying as to what the officer said to him, it is not hearsay - it is merely the defendant telling the court what was said to him by the officer. If the statement is something a witness overheard the officer say to the defendant, then the question is what are you trying to prove.By definition, "hearsay" is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered as evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. [Italics are mine]. For example, a witness named Bob testifies that Joe told him "The sky was green" in order to make the point that the sky was green - hearsay. If it is not offered to prove the sky was green, it does not fit the definition of hearsay.If you are trying have it admitted as Tom's testimony that, while Tom was standing there, Officer Pencil said, "Look Jerry, you Mother [effin'] punk, you're drunk" for the purpose of showing that Jerry is/was in fact drunk, then the statement is hearsay and probably not admissible. If you want the statement admitted to show that Tom heard Officer Pencil use an explitive, it would probably be admissable since it is not being offered to show 'the truth of the matter asserted (that Jerry was drunk)' by the declarant (Ofc. Pencil), but instead offered to show the content of the statement - what was said - that Tom overheard. Offered as evidence in this manner, it is not hearsay. Tom is testifying as to what he heard. Again, also, if Jerry is testifying about the statement, it is his testimony of what he claims was said to him - it is his perception of events, it is not hearsay.
Not every statement is a matter of opinion. Some statements can be based on facts, evidence, or objective truths. Opinion-based statements are typically subjective and can vary among different individuals.
air is composed OF matter
Tax statements are not a matter of public record.
"If you are 15 ft. under water, the pressure will be the same no matter how large the body of water is" is a true statements about fluid pressure.
There are many different services offered by the Hilton Hotel in York. While the best service offered in a matter of opinion, one guest commented they loved the Hilton pillows.
I've been told that masturbation is a (free) activity that can lead to state of contentment in a matter of minutes! Thorough research into that matter has confirmed these statements.
Catch statements are evaluated in the order in which they are written. Therefore, the more specific exception should be caught first. (If one exception is a subclass of another one, catch it first.)