0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What can scientists do if the results of an experiment do not support a hypothesis?
draw conclusions
What can scientists do if the results of an experiment do not support hypothesis?
draw conclusions
Why do scientists form a hypothesis?
it helps them analyze data and draw conclusions
Why do scientists test other scientists conclusions?
Lots of different scientists test the same things to compare different conclusions.
How does a scientist critique another scientists conclusions?
By presenting data that contradict those conclusions
What can scientists do if the results of an experiments do not support a hypothesis?
draw conclusions
What can scientists do if the results of an experiment do not support a hypothesis?
draw conclusions
What can scientists do if the results of an experiment do not support hypothesis?
draw conclusions
Why do scientists form a hypothesis?
it helps them analyze data and draw conclusions
How did scientists able to draw conclusions about how long El Nino has been affecting the weather?
they just do it cause they are scientists
What do scientists draw after analyzing data from experiment?
After analyzing data from their experiments, scientists will draw conclusions. They will consider whether their hypothesis was correct and what the observable trends were in the data.
How do scientists draw conclusions when it's impossible to conduct an experiment?
Scientista can study situations and makle observations from which to draw conclusions. An example of this is Astronomy where experimentat6ion is currently not possible but observation is possible.
What did scientists use to draw conclusions about the structure of matter before the use of correct tools?
Hypothisis
How can scientists lean about the mantle if they cannot study it directly?
scientists must use observations of earths surface to draw conclusions about the mantle.
Which statement is true about how scientists draw conclusion from data?
Two scientists may have different underlying assumptions that lead them to different conclusions about the same data.
Why don't we consider alchemists to be scientists?
Because the alchemists learned by trial and error they never tried to take their observations and draw conclusions.
Why do scientists test other scientists conclusions?
Lots of different scientists test the same things to compare different conclusions.
