0
What are some examples of written records used by historians to acquire data about the past?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
The Rosetta stone.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How do historians learn about the past?
Historians learn about the past by using artifacts geography written records/books and interviews/oral tradition.
What perception do modern historians have of the Persians?
Because most of the records historians have about the Persians were written by Greeks, the history is very skewed (Greeks hated the Persians- they had lots of wars). It's very negatively biased.
What are some problems that face historians when studying the Celts?
Many people in the Celtic societies were not literate, so written records of any kind are very hard to find.
Did the Zhou dynasty write the first written records in china?
No. The first written records in china were written by the Shang Dynasty
How do historians investigate history?
Present day historians investigate the histories already written by: * checking the resources used by historians who have written about a particular subject; * by investigating any sources that were overlooked; and * searching primary, secondary leads that may bring to light new sources of historical information.
How do historians learn about the past?
Historians learn about the past by using artifacts geography written records/books and interviews/oral tradition.
How did historians find out about events that happended without writing books and etc?
When exploring the periods for which there are no written records at all, historians have to reply on archaeological evidence.
Written records have existed for how many years?
Written records have existed for at least 5000 years. Early examples of written records are found in Egyptian writings that exist within the pyramids.
What three tools do historians use to help them answer questions about the past?
Historians rely on artifacts, oral tradition and written records to answer questions about the past. Artifacts are materials left behind by cultures, oral traditions are stories that have survived through ancestry and written records can be non fiction or fiction.
What three tools the historians use to help them answer questions about the past?
Historians rely on artifacts, oral tradition and written records to answer questions about the past. Artifacts are materials left behind by cultures, oral traditions are stories that have survived through ancestry and written records can be non fiction or fiction.
The written records studied by historians often began as?
You should really look in your book when doing homework, but the answer is MYTHS.
What did the colonists of Roanoke island suffer?
Historians don't know since there are no written records and no one knows what happened to them.
What perception do modern historians have of the Persians?
Because most of the records historians have about the Persians were written by Greeks, the history is very skewed (Greeks hated the Persians- they had lots of wars). It's very negatively biased.
What does written records studied by historian often began as?
Written records studied by historians often began as inscriptions on stone tablets, papyrus scrolls, or clay tablets. These inscriptions recorded significant events, transactions, laws, and other important information of societies in the past.
What do you think primary sources or secondary sources are more valuable to modern historians?
Primary sources are generally more valuable to modern historians because they offer a direct glimpse into the time period being studied, providing firsthand accounts or evidence. Secondary sources, while useful for interpreting and analyzing primary sources, may introduce bias or misinterpretations that can skew historical understanding.
DO you think primary sources or secondary sources are more valuable to modern historians?
Primary sources are the most valuable sources of information to modern historians and to ancient historians. Primary sources are ironclad proof and can stand alone on their own. They include such things as birth, death, and marriage records; wills; property records; legal documents; charters; firsthand accounts; tombstones; censuses; surveys; letters; personal records; military service records; baptismal records; official court records (as in royal court/king's court); rolls of all kinds; registers. Historians love primary sources because it makes their work much easier and more credible. Secondary sources are not as ironclad as primary sources. Historians use these sources when primary sources aren't available or known. Secondary sources include things like chronicles and narratives written by monks/concurrent historians, hearsay, old pedigrees, church records; tradition, and records or written information that have no solid, underlying proof. No matter how many secondary sources someone might use to bolster a statement, it is not considered to be foolproof evidence. It's similar to the idea of proof in a trial: Eyewitness testimony and documentation are believable; whereas hearsay and opinions aren't.
What are some problems that face historians when studying the Celts?
Many people in the Celtic societies were not literate, so written records of any kind are very hard to find.
