The most serious problem would be anarchy and the ills that go with it.
The above answer is nonsense perpetuated by those who wish to keep and grow their power and control.
Anarchy is simply the absence of rulers. It is not inherently bad.
The absence of a national government would solve more problems than would be created. Its only legitimate purpose is to facilitate those tasks that state governments cannot do.
That's why the men who designed this country put strong limits on the central government which they rightly saw as a necessary evil.
That's why they included the 10th amendment to the Constitution which reads...
"The powers not delegated to the United States [federal government] by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it [the Constitution] to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people."
Their intent was to limit the government (which, after all, is only people with power to rule other people) and empower the individual.
Some possible problems that might result from lack of a national court system are violation of rights, injustices among others.
Well it is a huge problem. Now the reason? Well, there are many.
NO. North Korea is a unitary state, not a federation. As a result, it has no federal government, but rather a single national government.
The establishment by the federal government of safeguards against future depressions.
The problems of the people would be full employment.
The convention was the result of a campaign to reform the first charter of government of the United States, the Articles of Confederation. Throughout the 1780s, politicians who thought in national terms worried that the Confederation faced problems its government was too weak to solve.
anarchy
Well it is a huge problem. Now the reason? Well, there are many.
The national government
If everyone had a different national court system each state would get a different punishmentstate courts might interpret laws differently, no federal system of appeals
If everyone had a different national court system each state would get a different punishmentstate courts might interpret laws differently, no federal system of appeals
If everyone had a different national court system each state would get a different punishmentstate courts might interpret laws differently, no federal system of appeals
If everyone had a different national court system each state would get a different punishmentstate courts might interpret laws differently, no federal system of appeals
If everyone had a different national court system each state would get a different punishmentstate courts might interpret laws differently, no federal system of appeals
NO. North Korea is a unitary state, not a federation. As a result, it has no federal government, but rather a single national government.
many revisions of the Articles to strengthen the national government
The establishment by the federal government of safeguards against future depressions.
The problems of the people would be full employment.