they both are from New York
they both are from New York
the mayflower compact house of burgesses and fundamental orders of connecticut are all examples of the efforts of colonial americans to
this did nothing >:(
they both are used by the puritans in Massachusetts.
Pilgrim @
Democratic and Representative
The Federal Constitution
The Mayflower Compact and the Fundamental Orders of 1638-1639 both represent early forms of self-governance in colonial America. The Mayflower Compact, signed by Pilgrims aboard the Mayflower in 1620, established a framework for governance based on majority rule and consent of the governed. The Fundamental Orders, enacted by the Connecticut River towns, expanded on these ideas by creating a more structured government and is often considered the first written constitution in the Western tradition. Both documents reflect the colonists' desire for democratic principles and local control.
The fundamental orders of Connecticut and the Mayflower compact were early simple forms of government. The fundamental orders of Connecticut is a form of the Constitution. The people in the colony of Connecticut were provided a representative government that allowed colonists to be elected and help in the decision of key issues or on laws/regulations.
The fundamental orders of Connecticut and the Mayflower compact were early simple forms of government. The fundamental orders of Connecticut is a form of the Constitution. The people in the colony of Connecticut were provided a representative government that allowed colonists to be elected and help in the decision of key issues or on laws/regulations.
Well, the Mayflower Compact helped reflect the English contribution by giving every man on the ship the right to vote leading to present day every citizen being able to vote. The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut reflects by describing representative government in detail. Tell me if it helped.
The Mayflower Compact was NOT a constitution. It was a social agreement. The answer is the Articles of Confederation.